Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27740711›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2017

Behavioural benefits of multisensory processing in ferrets.

Amy Hammond-Kenny, Victoria M Bajo, Andrew J King, Fernando R Nodal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sound Improves Neuronal Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Implementation of Manual and Automated Water Regulation for Rats (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy Hammond-KennyDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK.
Victoria M BajoDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-2048
Andrew J KingDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-7179
Fernando R NodalDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT076508AIAWellcome Trust WT108369/Z/2015/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced detection and discrimination, along with faster reaction times, are the most typical behavioural manifestations of the brain's capacity to integrate multisensory signals arising from the same object. In this study, we examined whether multisensory behavioural gains are observable across different components of the localization response that are potentially under the command of distinct brain regions. We measured the ability of ferrets to localize unisensory (auditory or visual) and spatiotemporally coincident auditory-visual stimuli of different durations that were presented from one of seven locations spanning the frontal hemifield. During the localization task, we recorded the head movements made following stimulus presentation, as a metric for assessing the initial orienting response of the ferrets, as well as the subsequent choice of which target location to approach to receive a reward. Head-orienting responses to auditory-visual stimuli were more accurate and faster than those made to visual but not auditory targets, suggesting that these movements were guided principally by sound alone. In contrast, approach-to-target localization responses were more accurate and faster to spatially congruent auditory-visual stimuli throughout the frontal hemifield than to either visual or auditory stimuli alone. Race model inequality analysis of head-orienting reaction times and approach-to-target response times indicates that different processes, probability summation and neural integration, respectively, are likely to be responsible for the effects of multisensory stimulation on these two measures of localization behaviour.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionBehavior, AnimalBrainFemaleFerretsMaleOrientationPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVisual Perceptionauditory localizationmultisensory integrationorientingreaction timevisual localization

Identifiers

PMID27740711
PMCPMC5298019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.