Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27740710›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2017

Differential localization of PER1 and PER2 in the brain master circadian clock.

Malini Riddle, Erica Mezias, Duncan Foley, Joseph LeSauter, Rae Silver

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Circadian rhythms and the HPA axis: A systems view.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Keeping time in the lamina terminalis: Novel oscillator properties of forebrain sensory circumventricular organs.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malini RiddleNeuroscience Program, Barnard College of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Erica MeziasNeuroscience Program, Barnard College of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Duncan FoleyDepartment of Economics, New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph LeSauterNeuroscience Program, Barnard College of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Rae SilverNeuroscience Program, Barnard College of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Barnard College · USColumbia University · USNew School · US

Funding

PHYSIOLOGICAL DISSECTION OF THE SCNR01NS037919 · NINDS · BARNARD COLLEGE · PI SILVER, RAE · 1998 to 2010
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS037919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), locus of the master circadian clock, bears many neuronal types. At the cellular-molecular level, the clock is comprised of feedback loops involving 'clock' genes including Period1 and Period2, and their protein products, PERIOD1 and PERIOD2 (PER1/2). In the canonical model of circadian oscillation, the PER1/2 proteins oscillate together. While their rhythmic expression in the SCN as a whole has been described, the possibility of regional differences remains unknown. To explore these clock proteins in distinct SCN regions, we assessed their expression through the rostro-caudal extent of the SCN in sagittal sections. We developed an automated method for tracking three fluorophores in digital images of sections triply labeled for PER1, PER2, and gastrin-releasing peptide (used to locate the core). In the SCN as a whole, neurons expressing high levels of PER2 were concentrated in the rostral, rostrodorsal, and caudal portions of the nucleus, and those expressing high levels of PER1 lay in a broad central area. Within these overall patterns, adjacent cells differed in expression levels of the two proteins. The results demonstrate spatially distinct localization of high PER1 vs. PER2 expression, raising the possibility that their distribution is functionally significant in encoding and communicating temporal information. The findings provoke the question of whether there are fundamental differences in PER1/2 levels among SCN neurons and/or whether topographical differences in protein expression are a product of SCN network organization rather than intrinsic differences among neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsCircadian ClocksGastrin-Releasing PeptideMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsPeriod Circadian ProteinsSuprachiasmatic NucleusGastrin-Releasing PeptidePer1 protein, mousePer2 protein, mousePeriod Circadian Proteinscircadian rhythmclock genemousePERIOD proteinsuprachiasmatic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID27740710
PMCPMC5392174
OpenAlexW2531535137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.