Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27740600›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2016

Disorders of Consciousness: Painless or Painful Conditions?-Evidence from Neuroimaging Studies.

Francesca Pistoia, Simona Sacco, Janet Stewart, Marco Sarà, Antonio Carolei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research on Dementia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. I Feel! Therefore, I Am from Pain to Consciousness in DOC Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Redefining a minimal rehabilitation assessment protocol for severe acquired brain injuries.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesca PistoiaNeurological Institute, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila 67100, Italy. francesca.pistoia@univaq.it.
Simona SaccoNeurological Institute, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila 67100, Italy. simona.sacco@cc.univaq.it.
Janet StewartPsychology Division, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Scotland FK8, UK. janet@bollati.info.
Marco SaràPost-Coma Intensive Rehabilitation Care Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Cassino 03043, Italy. marco.sara@sanraffaele.it.
Antonio CaroleiNeurological Institute, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila 67100, Italy. antonio.carolei@univaq.it.
University of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Stirling · GBVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experience of pain in disorders of consciousness is still debated. Neuroimaging studies, using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) and laser-evoked potentials, suggest that the perception of pain increases with the level of consciousness. Brain activation in response to noxious stimuli has been observed in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), which is also referred to as a vegetative state (VS), as well as those in a minimally conscious state (MCS). However, all of these techniques suggest that pain-related brain activation patterns of patients in MCS more closely resemble those of healthy subjects. This is further supported by fMRI findings showing a much greater functional connectivity within the structures of the so-called pain matrix in MCS as compared to UWS/VS patients. Nonetheless, when interpreting the results, a distinction is necessary between autonomic responses to potentially harmful stimuli and conscious experience of the unpleasantness of pain. Even more so if we consider that the degree of residual functioning and cortical connectivity necessary for the somatosensory, affective and cognitive-evaluative components of pain processing are not yet clear. Although procedurally challenging, the particular value of the aforementioned techniques in the assessment of pain in disorders of consciousness has been clearly demonstrated. The study of pain-related brain activation and functioning can contribute to a better understanding of the networks underlying pain perception while addressing clinical and ethical questions concerning patient care. Further development of technology and methods should aim to increase the availability of neuroimaging, objective assessment of functional connectivity and analysis at the level of individual cases as well as group comparisons. This will enable neuroimaging to truly become a clinical tool to reliably investigate pain in severely brain-injured patients as well as an asset for research.

Indexed as

consciousnessminimally conscious stateneuroimagingpainunresponsive wakefulness syndromevegetative state

Identifiers

PMID27740600
PMCPMC5187561
OpenAlexW2527933796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.