Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27739895›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2016

An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement: Implementation Science in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine.

Curtis H Weiss, Jerry A Krishnan, David H Au, Bruce G Bender, Shannon S Carson, Adithya Cattamanchi, Michelle M Cloutier, Colin R Cooke, Karen Erickson, Maureen George and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Measuring Performance on the ABCDEF Bundle During Interprofessional Rounds via a Nurse-Based Assessment Tool.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Curtis H Weiss
Jerry A Krishnan
David H Au
Bruce G Bender
Shannon S Carson
Adithya Cattamanchi
Michelle M Cloutier
Colin R Cooke
Karen Erickson
Maureen George
Joe K Gerald
Lynn B Gerald
Christopher H Goss
Michael K Gould
Robert Hyzy
Jeremy M Kahn
Brian S Mittman
Erika M Mosesón
Richard A Mularski
Sairam Parthasarathy
Sanjay R Patel
Cynthia S Rand
Nancy S Redeker
Theodore F Reiss
Kristin A Riekert
Gordon D Rubenfeld
Judith A Tate
Kevin C Wilson
Carey C Thomson
ATS Ad Hoc Committee on Implementation Science
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Yale Center for Sleep Disturbance in Acute and Chronic ConditionsP20NR014126 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI REDEKER, NANCY S, YAGGI, HENRY KLAR · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
A novel implementation and social network strategy for acute pulmonary illnessesK23HL118139 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WEISS, CURTIS H. · 2013 to 2017
$781k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL118139NINR NIH HHS P20 NR014126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany advances in health care fail to reach patients. Implementation science is the study of novel approaches to mitigate this evidence-to-practice gap.

methodsThe American Thoracic Society (ATS) created a multidisciplinary ad hoc committee to develop a research statement on implementation science in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. The committee used an iterative consensus process to define implementation science and review the use of conceptual frameworks to guide implementation science for the pulmonary, critical care, and sleep community and to explore how professional medical societies such as the ATS can promote implementation science.

resultsThe committee defined implementation science as the study of the mechanisms by which effective health care interventions are either adopted or not adopted in clinical and community settings. The committee also distinguished implementation science from the act of implementation. Ideally, implementation science should include early and continuous stakeholder involvement and the use of conceptual frameworks (i.e., models to systematize the conduct of studies and standardize the communication of findings). Multiple conceptual frameworks are available, and we suggest the selection of one or more frameworks on the basis of the specific research question and setting. Professional medical societies such as the ATS can have an important role in promoting implementation science. Recommendations for professional societies to consider include: unifying implementation science activities through a single organizational structure, linking front-line clinicians with implementation scientists, seeking collaborations to prioritize and conduct implementation science studies, supporting implementation science projects through funding opportunities, working with research funding bodies to set the research agenda in the field, collaborating with external bodies responsible for health care delivery, disseminating results of implementation science through scientific journals and conferences, and teaching the next generation about implementation science through courses and other media.

conclusionsImplementation science plays an increasingly important role in health care. Through support of implementation science, the ATS and other professional medical societies can work with other stakeholders to lead this effort.

Indexed as

Critical CarePulmonary MedicineSleep Medicine SpecialtyTranslational Research, BiomedicalDiffusion of InnovationHumansLung DiseasesOrganizational PolicySleep Wake DisordersSocieties, Medicalimplementation researchimplementation scienceknowledge translationmedical societyquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID27739895
PMCPMC5441016
OpenAlexW2531715463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.