Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27739581›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2016

Identification of risk for severe psychiatric comorbidity in pediatric epilepsy.

Jana E Jones, Prabha Siddarth, Dace Almane, Suresh Gurbani, Bruce P Hermann, Rochelle Caplan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jana E JonesDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Prabha SiddarthSemel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Dace AlmaneDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Suresh GurbaniDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
Bruce P HermannDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Rochelle CaplanSemel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Neuropsychological Progression of New Onset EpilepsyR01NS044351 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HERMANN, BRUCE PHILLIP · 2003 to 2015
$6.3M
THOUGHT DISORDER: A DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY IN EPILEPSYR01NS032070 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CAPLAN, ROCHELLE · 1994 to 2003
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032070NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study identified items on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) that predict those children and adolescents with epilepsy at highest risk for multiple psychiatric diagnoses.

methodsThree hundred twenty-eight children, ages 5-18 years, and their parents participated in separate structured psychiatric interviews about the children, which yielded Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnoses. Parents completed the CBCL. The sample was divided into a younger (≤12 years, n = 214) group and an older (>12-18 years, n = 114) group. This study identified a reduced set of parent-reported CBCL items associated with Multiple Diagnoses versus Single Diagnosis versus No Diagnosis using chi-square tests and stepwise logistic regression. We then performed a generalized logistic regression with Multiple Diagnoses versus Single Diagnosis versus No Diagnosis as the dependent variable and the reduced CBCL set of items as predictors. We calculated the area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve (AUC) as a measure of diagnostic accuracy for pairwise comparisons.

resultsFor the younger group, seven items (clingy, cruelty/bullying, perfectionist, nervous, poor school work, inattentive, and sulks) had high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.88), and for the older group, three items (disobedient at school, loner, and lies/cheats) had high accuracy (AUC = 0.91) when comparing children with multiple psychiatric diagnoses to children with no diagnosis. For both age groups, there was less diagnostic accuracy in identifying children with a single versus no diagnosis (AUC = 0.75 [young]; 0.70 [older]). SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that responses to these two subsets of parent-reported CBCL items should alert clinicians to children and adolescents with epilepsy at risk for multiple psychiatric diagnoses and in need of a psychiatric referral.

Indexed as

AdolescentChecklistChildChild, PreschoolCognition DisordersComorbidityElectroencephalographyEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersRiskROC CurveSurveys and QuestionnairesPediatric epilepsyPsychiatric disordersRisk factorsScreening

Identifiers

PMID27739581
PMCPMC5868343
OpenAlexW2531451546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.