Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27739440›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2017

'Non-classical' HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Morgan Ballard, Florencia Jalikis, Gregor Krings, Rodney A Schmidt, Yunn-Yi Chen, Mara H Rendi, Suzanne M Dintzis, Kristin C Jensen, Robert B West, Richard K Sibley and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Image analysis for bright-field HER2 in situ hybridization: validation for clinical use.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computer-aided scoring ofJournal of pathology informatics · 2022
    Article
  17. Updates on breast biomarkers.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Morgan BallardDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Florencia JalikisUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gregor KringsUniversity of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rodney A SchmidtUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yunn-Yi ChenUniversity of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mara H RendiUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Suzanne M DintzisUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kristin C JensenDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Robert B WestDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Richard K SibleyDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Megan L TroxellDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kimberly H AllisonDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2013 CAP/ASCO HER2 Testing Guidelines Update modified HER2 FISH categories such that some cases with 'monosomy', 'co-amplification/polysomy', low-level increased HER2 signals or clustered heterogeneity now are considered amplified or equivocal. This study examines the frequency and clinico-pathologic characteristics of breast cancers with equivocal or 'non-classical' HER2 FISH results. Breast cancers (2001-2014) with HER2 FISH results, HER2 immunohistochemistry, ER, grade, and age from three institutions (Stanford, UCSF, UWMC) were collected. HER2 FISH was interpreted using the updated recommendations. Amplified cases with non-classical results were grouped into the following categories: (1) 'monosomy' (ratio ≥2.0, mean HER2/cell<4.0); (2) 'co-amplified' (ratio<2.0, mean HER2/cell ≥6.0); (3) 'low amplified' (ratio ≥2.0, mean HER2/cell 4.0-5.9). Heterogeneous cases with clustered HER2-positive cells were also included. Of 8068 cases, 5.2% were equivocal and 4.6% had a 'non-classical' HER2 amplified result; 1.4% 'monosomy', 0.8% 'co-amplified', 2.1% 'low amplified', and 0.3% clustered heterogeneity. These cancers had a high frequency of ER positive (80.4%), Nottingham grade 3 (52.1%) results. The highest percentage of grade 3 cancers (66.7%) and positive HER2 immunohistochemistry (31.7%) was in the 'co-amplified' group. The 'monosomy' group had the highest percent grade 1 cancers (13.3%) and was most frequently HER2 immunohistochemistry negative (30.1%). Equivocal cases had very similar characteristics to the 'low-amplified' category. Cases with non-classical HER2 amplification or equivocal results are typically ER positive, higher grade cancers. 'Co-amplified' cases have the highest frequencies of aggressive characteristics and 'monosomy' cases the highest frequencies of lower risk features. With little clinical outcomes data currently available on these non-classical HER2 results, these results support the current classification scheme for HER2 FISH, with case-by-case correlation with additional clinical-pathologic factors when evaluating whether to offer HER2-targeted therapies in these non-classical cases.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm GradingBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.