ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2017
'Non-classical' HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence enhances cancer cell selection for HER2 gene amplification assessment in breast carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive invasive breast cancers with different HER2 FISH patterns.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Image analysis for bright-field HER2 in situ hybridization: validation for clinical use.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Atypical Co-amplification with Co-localization of HER2 Gene in Breast Cancer: Combined IHC/FISH Approach as per ASCO/CAP 2018 Guidelines for Targeted Therapy Eligibility.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Efficacy of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer With Uncommon In Situ Hybridization Patterns or Discordant Immunohistochemistry.JCO oncology advances · 2024Article
- Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Review
- HER2-low breast cancer: evolution of HER2 expression from primary tumor to distant metastases.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Article
- Evolution and clinical significance of HER2-low status after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2023Article
- HER2-Low Status Is Not Accurate in Breast Cancer Core Needle Biopsy Samples: An Analysis of 5610 Consecutive Patients.Cancers · 2022Article
- HER2 amplification by next-generation sequencing to identify HER2-positive invasive breast cancer with negative HER2 immunohistochemistry.Cancer cell international · 2022Article
- Indian Data on HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemically Equivocal Results As Per 2018 ASCO/CAP Guidelines.South Asian journal of cancer · 2022Article
- HER2-low-positive breast cancer: evolution from primary tumor to residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment.NPJ breast cancer · 2022Article
- Histologic analysis according to HER2 gene status in HER2 2 + invasive breast cancer: a study of 280 cases comparing ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guideline recommendations.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022Article
- Computer-aided scoring ofJournal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
- Updates on breast biomarkers.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022Review
- Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine journal · 2021Article
- Evolution of HER2-low expression from primary to recurrent breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- Triple-Positive Breast Carcinoma: Histopathologic Features and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 2013 CAP/ASCO HER2 Testing Guidelines Update modified HER2 FISH categories such that some cases with 'monosomy', 'co-amplification/polysomy', low-level increased HER2 signals or clustered heterogeneity now are considered amplified or equivocal. This study examines the frequency and clinico-pathologic characteristics of breast cancers with equivocal or 'non-classical' HER2 FISH results. Breast cancers (2001-2014) with HER2 FISH results, HER2 immunohistochemistry, ER, grade, and age from three institutions (Stanford, UCSF, UWMC) were collected. HER2 FISH was interpreted using the updated recommendations. Amplified cases with non-classical results were grouped into the following categories: (1) 'monosomy' (ratio ≥2.0, mean HER2/cell<4.0); (2) 'co-amplified' (ratio<2.0, mean HER2/cell ≥6.0); (3) 'low amplified' (ratio ≥2.0, mean HER2/cell 4.0-5.9). Heterogeneous cases with clustered HER2-positive cells were also included. Of 8068 cases, 5.2% were equivocal and 4.6% had a 'non-classical' HER2 amplified result; 1.4% 'monosomy', 0.8% 'co-amplified', 2.1% 'low amplified', and 0.3% clustered heterogeneity. These cancers had a high frequency of ER positive (80.4%), Nottingham grade 3 (52.1%) results. The highest percentage of grade 3 cancers (66.7%) and positive HER2 immunohistochemistry (31.7%) was in the 'co-amplified' group. The 'monosomy' group had the highest percent grade 1 cancers (13.3%) and was most frequently HER2 immunohistochemistry negative (30.1%). Equivocal cases had very similar characteristics to the 'low-amplified' category. Cases with non-classical HER2 amplification or equivocal results are typically ER positive, higher grade cancers. 'Co-amplified' cases have the highest frequencies of aggressive characteristics and 'monosomy' cases the highest frequencies of lower risk features. With little clinical outcomes data currently available on these non-classical HER2 results, these results support the current classification scheme for HER2 FISH, with case-by-case correlation with additional clinical-pathologic factors when evaluating whether to offer HER2-targeted therapies in these non-classical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27739440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.