Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27739389›Full record

ReviewDevelopment and psychopathology2016

Understanding comorbidity among internalizing problems: Integrating latent structural models of psychopathology and risk mechanisms.

Benjamin L Hankin, Hannah R Snyder, Lauren D Gulley, Tina H Schweizer, Patricia Bijttebier, Sabine Nelis, Gim Toh, Michael W Vasey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development and psychopathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin L HankinUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign.
Hannah R SnyderBrandeis University.
Lauren D GulleyUniversity of Washington.
Tina H SchweizerUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign.
Patricia BijttebierKatholike University Leuven.
Sabine NelisKatholike University Leuven.
Gim TohOhio State University.
Michael W VaseyOhio State University.

Funding

Genetic cognitive and interpersonal vulnerabilities to depression in youthR01MH077195 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HANKIN, BENJAMIN L · 2007 to 2017
$3.4M
Prefrontal Mechanisms of Selection: Disrupted in Internalizing Psychopathology?R01MH105501 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BANICH, MARIE T, HANKIN, BENJAMIN L · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
Links among adolescent executive function, effortful control and psychopathologyR21MH102210 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY) · PI HANKIN, BENJAMIN L · 2014 to 2015
$418k
Links between depression and executive function impairments in adolescentsF32MH098481 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY) · PI SNYDER, HANNAH R. · 2013 to 2014
$99k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH098481NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077195NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105501NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH102210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that comorbidity is the rule, not the exception, for categorically defined psychiatric disorders, and this is also the case for internalizing disorders of depression and anxiety. This theoretical review paper addresses the ubiquity of comorbidity among internalizing disorders. Our central thesis is that progress in understanding this co-occurrence can be made by employing latent dimensional structural models that organize psychopathology as well as vulnerabilities and risk mechanisms and by connecting the multiple levels of risk and psychopathology outcomes together. Different vulnerabilities and risk mechanisms are hypothesized to predict different levels of the structural model of psychopathology. We review the present state of knowledge based on concurrent and developmental sequential comorbidity patterns among common discrete psychiatric disorders in youth, and then we advocate for the use of more recent bifactor dimensional models of psychopathology (e.g., p factor; Caspi et al., 2014) that can help to explain the co-occurrence among internalizing symptoms. In support of this relatively novel conceptual perspective, we review six exemplar vulnerabilities and risk mechanisms, including executive function, information processing biases, cognitive vulnerabilities, positive and negative affectivity aspects of temperament, and autonomic dysregulation, along with the developmental occurrence of stressors in different domains, to show how these vulnerabilities can predict the general latent psychopathology factor, a unique latent internalizing dimension, as well as specific symptom syndrome manifestations.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersCognitionDefense MechanismsDepressionDepressive DisorderExecutive FunctionHumansTemperament

Identifiers

PMID27739389
PMCPMC5119897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.