ArticleJournal of neurovirology2017
HSV-1 clinical isolates with unique in vivo and in vitro phenotypes and insight into genomic differences.
Article in Journal of neurovirology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-phenotype analysis for enhanced classification of 11 herpes simplex virus 1 strains.The Journal of general virology · 2022Article
- Impacts of Genome-Wide Analyses on Our Understanding of Human Herpesvirus Diversity and Evolution.Journal of virology · 2018Review
- Genome-wide engineering of an infectious clone of herpes simplex virus type 1 using synthetic genomics assembly methods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Strain-specific factors contribute in significant but undefined ways to the variable incidence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) recrudescence. Studies that investigate these strain-specific factors are needed. Here, we used qPCR, in vitro assays, and genomic sequencing to identify important relationships between in vitro and clinical phenotypes of unique HSV-1 clinical isolates. Nine HSV-1 isolates from individuals displaying varying reactivation patterns were studied. Isolates associated with frequent recurrent herpes labialis (RHL) (1) displayed higher rates of viral shedding in the oral cavity than those associated with rare RHL and (2) tended to replicate more efficiently at 33 °C than 39 °C. HSV-1 isolates also displayed a more stable phenotype during propagation in U2OS cells than in Vero cells. Draft genome sequences of four isolates and one variant spanning 95.6 to 97.2 % of the genome were achieved, and whole-genome alignment demonstrated that the majority of these isolates clustered with known North American/European isolates. These findings revealed procedures that could help identify unique genotypes and phenotypes associated with HSV-1 isolates, which can be important for determining viral factors critical for regulating HSV-1 reactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.