SynthesisArchives of osteoporosis2016
A qualitative systematic review of patients' experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography.
Synthesis in Archives of osteoporosis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Bisphosphonate alternative regimens for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: BLAST-OFF, a mixed-methods study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Metasynthesis of Patient Attitudes Toward Bone Densitometry.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Preliminary Evaluation of a Large Language Model-Powered Chatbot for Osteoporosis Self-Management Education: Formative Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Barriers and Facilitators to Self-Care Behaviors in People Living with Osteoporosis: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- The Michael Mason prize: development and feasibility testing of a complex intervention to improve adherence to fracture prevention medicine.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Living with osteoporosis: a qualitative descriptive study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025Article
- A reflexive thematic analysis of existential losses in men with osteoporosis: "I'm not the person I was somehow … although I am".BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- The evaluation of an osteoporosis medication management service in community pharmacy, a cohort study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of postmenopausal osteoporosis on the lives of Omani women and the use of cultural and religious practises to relieve pain: A hermeneutic phenomenological study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Gastrointestinal disease is an important influencing factor of osteoporosis fracture:a retrospective study in chinese postmenopausal women.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Article
- Research priorities to reduce the impact of musculoskeletal disorders: a priority setting exercise with the child health and nutrition research initiative method.The Lancet. Rheumatology · 2022Review
- Abaloparatide Real-World Patient Experience Study.JBMR plus · 2021Article
- Consequences of a Diagnostic Label: A Systematic Scoping Review and Thematic Framework.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a focus group study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2020Article
- A meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with urinary incontinence: 'is it just part and parcel of life?'BMC urology · 2020Article
- Screening to prevent fragility fractures among adults 40 years and older in primary care: protocol for a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to systematically review qualitative studies exploring the experience of living with osteoporosis to develop new conceptual understanding. We identified themes about the invisibility/visibility of osteoporosis, the experience of uncertainty of living with osteoporosis (OP) and living with an ageing body and the place of gender. PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to systematically review the body of qualitative studies exploring the experience of living with either osteoporosis or osteopenia and to use meta-ethnography to develop new conceptual understanding.
methodsWe systematically reviewed and integrated the findings of qualitative research from four bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Psychinfo) to September 2015 in order to increase our conceptual understanding of the lived experience of osteoporosis and osteopenia. Articles were appraised for quality; each was independently read by two researchers to identify concepts which were compared and developed into a conceptual model.
resultsOur findings demonstrate that coming to terms with a diagnosis of osteoporosis is linked to its relative visibility or invisibility. For some, OP has not become manifest and self-identity is intact (biographical integrity). For others, OP is profoundly manifest and self-identity is no long intact (biographical fracture). We also demonstrate that overwhelming uncertainty pervades the experience of OP. Our final theme demonstrates how the experience of OP is set within a cultural context with certain views about ageing and gender.
conclusionsOur synthesis has highlighted the wealth of qualitative data about osteoporosis and osteopenia. Despite the increasing body of literature on the subject, there remains a need to adjust our interactions with patients. This will allow clinicians to understand how patients can be helped to receive and understand their diagnosis and move forward in partnership with healthcare providers to promote optimal management of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.