Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27738822›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

The role of laryngeal electromyography in vagus nerve stimulation-related vocal fold dysmotility.

Alberto M Saibene, Elena Zambrelli, Carlotta Pipolo, Alberto Maccari, Giovanni Felisati, Elena Felisati, Francesca Furia, Aglaia Vignoli, Maria Paola Canevini, Enrico Alfonsi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cluster headache: crosspoint between otologists and neurologists-treatment of the sphenopalatine ganglion and systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto M SaibeneOtolaryngology Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. alberto.saibene@gmail.com.
Elena ZambrelliRegional Centre for Epilepsy, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta PipoloOtolaryngology Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Alberto MaccariOtolaryngology Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni FelisatiOtolaryngology Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Elena FelisatiOtolaryngology Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Francesca FuriaRegional Centre for Epilepsy, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Aglaia VignoliRegional Centre for Epilepsy, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Maria Paola CaneviniRegional Centre for Epilepsy, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Enrico AlfonsiNeurophysiopathology Service, Diagnostic Services Department, Neurological Institute "C. Mondino", Pavia, Italy.
Ospedale San Paolo · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a useful tool for drug-resistant epilepsy, but it induces known laryngeal side effects, with a significant role on patients' quality of life. VNS patients may show persistent left vocal fold (LVF) palsy at rest and/or recurrent LVF adduction during stimulation. This study aims at electromyographically evaluating laryngeal muscles abnormalities in VNS patients. We compared endoscopic laryngeal evaluation data in six VNS patients with laryngeal muscle electromyography (LMEMG) carried out on the thyroarytenoid, cricothyroid, posterior cricoarytenoid, and cricopharyngeal muscles. Endoscopy showed LVF palsy at rest in 3/6 patients in whom LMEMG documented a tonic spastic activity with reduced phasic modulation. In four out of six patients with recurrent LVF adduction during VNS activation, LMEMG showed a compound muscle action potential persisting for the whole stimulation. This is the first LMEMG report of VNS-induced motor unit activation via recurrent laryngeal nerve and upper laryngeal nerve stimulation. LMEMG data were could, therefore, be considered consistent with the endoscopic laryngeal examination in all patient.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyVagus Nerve StimulationAdultEndoscopyEpilepsyFemaleHumansLaryngeal MusclesLaryngeal NervesMaleMiddle AgedPhonationQuality of LifeVocal Cord ParalysisDrug-resistant epilepsyElectrical stimulationElectromyographyManuscriptVocal cord paresis

Identifiers

PMID27738822
OpenAlexW2530347394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.