Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27738804›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2017

Sentinel node detection in muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer is feasible after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in all pT stages, a prospective multicenter report.

Robert Rosenblatt, Markus Johansson, Farhood Alamdari, Alexander Sidiki, Benny Holmström, Johan Hansson, Janos Vasko, Per Marits, Susanne Gabrielsson, Katrine Riklund and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Robert RosenblattDepartment of Urology, Stockholm South General Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Markus JohanssonDepartment of Urology, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Farhood AlamdariDepartment of Urology, Västmanland Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.
Alexander SidikiDepartment of Urology, Länssjukhuset Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden.
Benny HolmströmDepartment of Urology, Akademiska University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan HanssonCentre for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Uppsala, Sweden.
Janos VaskoDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Per MaritsDepartment of Medicine, Unit for Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne GabrielssonDepartment of Medicine, Unit for Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katrine RiklundDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ola WinqvistDepartment of Medicine, Unit for Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Amir SherifDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden. amir.m.sherif@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-3050
Karolinska Institutet · SEUmeå University · SESundsvall Municipality · SEUppsala University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SEVästmanlands sjukhus Västerås · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether sentinel node detection (SNd) in muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC) can be performed in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and determine whether SNd is feasible in all pT stages, including pT0.

backgroundPrevious published series of SNd in MIBC have not included patients undergoing NAC, and systematic reports of pT0 patients w/wo NAC were absent. Translational immunological tumor research on MIBC focusing on SNd, in the era of NAC, requires technical feasibility. Additionally, SNd in MIBC requests further evaluations as a method for nodal staging. MATERIALS AND

methodsNinety-nine patients with suspected urothelial MIBC were prospectively selected from six urological centers. After TUR-B and primary staging, 65 MIBC patients qualified for radical cystectomy. Precystectomy staging was cT2a-T4aN0M0, including 47 NAC patients and 18 chemo-naïve patients. All 65 patients underwent intraoperative SNd by peritumoral injection of 80 Mbq Technetium and Geiger probe detection. Postcystectomy staging was pT0-T4aN0-N2M0. SNs were defined by two calculations, SNdef1 and SNdef2.

resultsTotally 1063 lymph nodes were removed (total SNs; 222-227). NAC patients with pT0 (n = 24) displayed a true positive detection in 91.7 % by either SNdef, with a median of 3.0 SNs. NACpT >0 patients had a true positive detection in 87 % (SNdef1) and 91.3 % (SNdef2). In a univariate analysis, patient group neither NAC nor tumor downstaging influenced detection rates, regardless of SN definition. In total eight patients, 4/22 metastatic nodes were SNs while 18/22 were non-SNs.

conclusionsSentinel node detection in MIBC is feasible also in NAC patients, regardless of pT stage. SNd played no role in nodal staging.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Transitional CellCystectomyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingCisplatinCystectomyImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant therapySentinel lymph node biopsyUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27738804
PMCPMC5486537
OpenAlexW2530545047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.