Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27738493›Full record

ArticleGenes & cancer2016

Pathway analysis of bladder cancer genome-wide association study identifies novel pathways involved in bladder cancer development.

Meng Chen, Nathaniel Rothman, Yuanqing Ye, Jian Gu, Paul A Scheet, Maosheng Huang, David W Chang, Colin P Dinney, Debra T Silverman, Jonine D Figueroa and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Article
  7. Role of Genetic Variations inCancer genomics & proteomics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meng ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Nathaniel RothmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Yuanqing YeDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jian GuDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Paul A ScheetDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Maosheng HuangDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
David W ChangDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Colin P DinneyDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Debra T SilvermanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jonine D FigueroaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stephen J ChanockDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Xifeng WuDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Bladder CancerU01CA127615 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WU, XIFENG · 2008 to 2012
$5.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA127615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are designed to identify individual regions associated with cancer risk, but only explain a small fraction of the inherited variability. Alternative approach analyzing genetic variants within biological pathways has been proposed to discover networks of susceptibility genes with additional effects. The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) may complement and expand traditional GWAS analysis to identify novel genes and pathways associated with bladder cancer risk. We selected three GSEA methods: Gen-Gen, Aligator, and the SNP Ratio Test to evaluate cellular signaling pathways involved in bladder cancer susceptibility in a Texas GWAS population. The candidate genetic polymorphisms from the significant pathway selected by GSEA were validated in an independent NCI GWAS. We identified 18 novel pathways (

Indexed as

bladder cancergene set enrichment analysisGWASpathway analysissusceptibility loci

Identifiers

PMID27738493
PMCPMC5059113
OpenAlexW2511604088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.