Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27738440›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2016

Web-Based Evaluation System to Measure Learning Effectiveness in Kampo Medicine.

Norio Iizuka, Koichiro Usuku, Hajime Nakae, Makoto Segawa, Yue Wang, Kahori Ogashiwa, Yusuke Fujita, Hiroyuki Ogihara, Susumu Tazuma, Yoshihiko Hamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Norio IizukaDepartment of Kampo Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Department of Kampo Medicine, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8294-8089
Koichiro UsukuMedical Information Science and Administrative Planning, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto City 860-8556, Japan.
Hajime NakaeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita 010-8543, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3733-3530
Makoto SegawaDepartment of Kampo Medicine, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Yue WangMedia and Information Technology Center, Organization for Academic Information, Yamaguchi University, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Kahori OgashiwaLiberal and General Education Center, Utsunomiya University, 350 Mine-machi, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321-8505, Japan.
Yusuke FujitaGraduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, 2-16-1 Tokiwadai, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8611, Japan.
Hiroyuki OgiharaGraduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, 2-16-1 Tokiwadai, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8611, Japan.
Susumu TazumaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
Yoshihiko HamamotoGraduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, 2-16-1 Tokiwadai, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8611, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4826-3507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the learning effectiveness of Kampo Medicine (KM) education is challenging. The aim of this study was to develop a web-based test to measure the learning effectiveness of KM education among medical students (MSs). We used an open-source Moodle platform to test 30 multiple-choice questions classified into 8-type fields (eight basic concepts of KM) including "qi-blood-fluid" and "five-element" theories, on 117 fourth-year MSs. The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) score on the web-based test was 30.2 ± 11.9 (/100). The correct answer rate ranged from 17% to 36%. A pattern-based portfolio enabled these rates to be individualized in terms of KM proficiency. MSs with scores higher (

Identifiers

PMID27738440
PMCPMC5055925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.