Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27738007›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2016

Clinically Approved Nanoparticle Imaging Agents.

Avnesh S Thakor, Jesse V Jokerst, Pejman Ghanouni, Jos L Campbell, Erik Mittra, Sanjiv S Gambhir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Avnesh S ThakorDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; and.
Jesse V JokerstDepartment of Nano Engineering, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California.
Pejman GhanouniDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; and.
Jos L CampbellDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; and.
Erik MittraDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; and.
Sanjiv S GambhirDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; and sgambhir@stanford.edu.

Funding

Nano Characterization and Nano Fabrication CoreU54CA199075 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 2015 to 2019
$9.6M
Nanoparticle-Based Triple Modality Imaging and Photothermal Therapy of Brain TumorsR01CA199656 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, JIANGHONG · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199656NCI NIH HHS U54 CA199075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles are a new class of imaging agent used for both anatomic and molecular imaging. Nanoparticle-based imaging exploits the signal intensity, stability, and biodistribution behavior of submicron-diameter molecular imaging agents. This review focuses on nanoparticles used in human medical imaging, with an emphasis on radionuclide imaging and MRI. Newer nanoparticle platforms are also discussed in relation to theranostic and multimodal uses.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalNanoparticlesDiagnostic ImagingHumansNanotechnologyimaging and diagnosticsmedical imagingmolecular imagingnanoparticlenanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID27738007
PMCPMC5126695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.