Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27737997›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2016

Documenting coordination of cancer care between primary care providers and oncology specialists in Canada.

Melissa C Brouwers, Marija Vukmirovic, Jennifer R Tomasone, Eva Grunfeld, Robin Urquhart, Mary Ann O'Brien, Melanie Walker, Fiona Webster, Margaret Fitch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Family Physician Training Needs to Improve Cancer Patient Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Coordination Models for Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Melissa C BrouwersProfessor and Lead of Health Services Research in the Department of Oncology, a scientist with the Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, and an associate member of the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, all at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont. mbrouwer@mcmaster.ca.
Marija VukmirovicResearch Coordinator in the Department of Oncology at McMaster University.
Jennifer R TomasoneAssistant Professor in the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont.
Eva GrunfeldGiblon Professor and Vice-Chair of Research in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario and Director of Knowledge Translation Research in the Health Services Research Program at the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research.
Robin UrquhartAssistant Professor in the Department of Surgery at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS.
Mary Ann O'BrienAssistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto and Scientific Associate with the Knowledge Translation Research Network, Health Services Research Program, and Ontario Institute for Cancer Research.
Melanie WalkerAn epidemiologist in the Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology of the Cancer Research Institute at Queen's University.
Fiona WebsterAssistant Professor and Education Scientist in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto, a fellow of the Centre for Critical Qualitative Health Research, and a cross-appointed scientist with the Wilson Centre.
Margaret FitchHead of Oncology Nursing and the Patient and Family Support Program at the Odette Cancer Centre of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Associate Professor in the Faculty of Nursing and Professor in the School of Graduate Studies at the University of Toronto.
McMaster University · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CACancer Research Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKDalhousie University · CAQueen's University · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe Wilson Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report on the findings of the CanIMPACT (Canadian Team to Improve Community-Based Cancer Care along the Continuum) Casebook project, which systematically documented Canadian initiatives (ie, programs and projects) designed to improve or support coordination and continuity of cancer care between primary care providers (PCPs) and oncology specialists.

designPan-Canadian environmental scan.

settingCanada.

participantsIndividuals representing the various initiatives provided data for the analysis.

methodsInitiatives included in the Casebook met the following criteria: they supported coordination and collaboration between PCPs and oncology specialists; they were related to diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, or personalized medicine; and they included breast or colorectal cancer or both. Data were collected on forms that were compiled into summaries (ie, profiles) for each initiative. Casebook initiatives were organized based on the targeted stage of the cancer care continuum, jurisdiction, and strategy (ie, model of care or type of intervention) employed. Thematic analysis identified similarities and differences among employed strategies, the level of primary care engagement, implementation barriers and facilitators, and initiative evaluation. MAIN

findingsThe CanIMPACT Casebook profiles 24 initiatives. Eleven initiatives targeted the survivorship stage of the cancer care continuum and 15 focused specifically on breast or colorectal cancer or both. Initiative teams implemented the following strategies: nurse patient navigation, multidisciplinary care teams, electronic communication or information systems, PCP education, and multicomponent initiatives. Initiatives engaged PCPs at various levels. Implementation barriers included lack of care standardization across jurisdictions and incompatibility among electronic communication systems. Implementation facilitators included having clinical and program leaders publicly support the initiative, repurposing existing resources, receiving financial support, and establishing a motivated and skilled project or program team. The lack of evaluative data made it difficult to identify the most effective interventions or models of care.

conclusionThe CanIMPACT Casebook documents Canadian efforts to improve or support the coordination of cancer care by PCPs and oncology specialists as a means to improve patient outcomes and cancer system performance.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMedical OncologySpecializationCanadaContinuity of Patient CareHumansNeoplasmsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27737997
PMCPMC5063788
OpenAlexW2534258668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.