Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27737893›Full record

ReviewFEMS yeast research2016

Emerging roles for histone modifications in DNA excision repair.

Peng Mao, John J Wyrick

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS yeast research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. DNA Repair in Nucleosomes: Insights from Histone Modifications and Mutants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Epigenetic Regulation of Nucleotide Excision Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nucleosomes Regulate Base Excision Repair in Chromatin.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng MaoSchool of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
John J WyrickSchool of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA jwyrick@vetmed.wsu.edu.
Washington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair is critical to maintain genome stability. In eukaryotic cells, DNA repair is complicated by the packaging of the DNA 'substrate' into chromatin. DNA repair pathways utilize different mechanisms to overcome the barrier presented by chromatin to efficiently locate and remove DNA lesions in the genome. DNA excision repair pathways are responsible for repairing a majority of DNA lesions arising in the genome. Excision repair pathways include nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER), which repair bulky and non-bulky DNA lesions, respectively. Numerous studies have suggested that chromatin inhibits both NER and BER in vitro and in vivo Growing evidence demonstrates that histone modifications have important roles in regulating the activity of NER and BER enzymes in chromatin. Here, we will discuss the roles of different histone modifications and the corresponding modifying enzymes in DNA excision repair, highlighting the role of yeast as a model organism for many of these studies.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairHistone CodeChromatinDNAGenomic InstabilityChromatinDNABERchromatinDNA repairhistone acetylationNER

Identifiers

PMID27737893
PMCPMC5976035
OpenAlexW2531931752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.