Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27737883›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Primary healthcare usage and morbidity among immigrant children compared with non-immigrant children: a population-based study in Norway.

Lars T Fadnes, Kathy Ainul Møen, Esperanza Diaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Variation in disease in children according to immigrant background.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lars T FadnesDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8757-2092
Kathy Ainul MøenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Esperanza DiazDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Norwegian Centre for Minority Health Research, Norway.
University of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHealth status, disease spectrum and use of healthcare have been reported to vary across groups of migrants and according to the different phases of migration. However, most studies are conducted among adults. This study assesses usage of primary healthcare (PHC) by children with immigrant background compared with non-immigrant children in Norway and describes their relative morbidity burden.

designPopulation-based retrospective cohort study.

settingThis study used 3 linked population-based registers in Norway for children under 18 years of age in 2008. MAIN EXPOSURE AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Immigrants were defined as children with both parents born abroad, and further classified into first and second generation, and according to the World Bank income categories of their parents' country of origin. Usage and morbidity were assessed with negative binomial regression and logistic regression analyses, respectively. Further, population-attributable fraction analyses on PHC visits were conducted to estimate the impact on the primary health system.

participants1 168 365 children including 119 251 with immigrant background.

resultsThe mean number of visits to PHC for non-immigrant children was 1.40 compared with 1.19 for immigrants from high-income countries (HIC) and 1.76 for immigrants from low-income countries (LIC). Compared with non-immigrants, first generation immigrants used PHC significantly less after adjusting for age and sex (incidence risk ratio (IRR) 0.70 (HIC) to 0.93 (LIC)) while second generation immigrant children generally used PHC more (IRR 1.03 (HIC) to 1.43 (LIC)); however, the median number of visits were similar between all groups. The morbidity spectrum also varied between the groups.

conclusionsCompared with non-immigrants, the excess number of consultations attributable to immigrant groups corresponds to around 1.3% of PHC visits among children.

Indexed as

Utilization ReviewAdolescentChildEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMorbidityNorwayPrimary Health CareRegistriesRetrospective StudiesPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID27737883
PMCPMC5073609
OpenAlexW2530196527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.