Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27737707›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2016

The application of theories of the policy process to obesity prevention: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Brydie Clarke, Boyd Swinburn, Gary Sacks

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Modelling the Health Policy Process: One Size Fits All or Horses for Courses?International journal of health policy and management · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brydie ClarkeGlobal Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia. e.brydie.clarke@health.vic.gov.au.
Boyd SwinburnGlobal Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.
Gary SacksGlobal Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTheories of the policy process are recommended as tools to help explain both policy stasis and change.

methodsA systematic review of the application of such theoretical frameworks within the field of obesity prevention policy was conducted. A meta-synthesis was also undertaken to identify the key influences on policy decision-making.

resultsThe review identified 17 studies of obesity prevention policy underpinned by political science theories. The majority of included studies were conducted in the United States (US), with significant heterogeneity in terms of policy level (e.g., national, state) studied, areas of focus, and methodologies used. Many of the included studies were methodologically limited, in regard to rigour and trustworthiness. Prominent themes identified included the role of groups and networks, political institutions, and political system characteristics, issue framing, the use of evidence, personal values and beliefs, prevailing political ideology, and timing.

conclusionsThe limited application of political science theories indicates a need for future theoretically based research into the complexity of policy-making and multiple influences on obesity prevention policy processes.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingPoliticsHumansObesityUnited StatesFoodNutritionObesity preventionPolicyPolicy process

Identifiers

PMID27737707
PMCPMC5064928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.