Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27737558›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2017

Adjuvants to Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure. Adoption, De-adoption, and Factors Associated with Selection.

Laveena Munshi, Hayley B Gershengorn, Eddy Fan, Hannah Wunsch, Niall D Ferguson, Therese A Stukel, Gordon D Rubenfeld

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Adjuvant Therapies for ARDS: Not Ready for Prime Time?Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laveena Munshi1 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Mount Sinai Hospital, University Health Network, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hayley B Gershengorn2 Division of Critical Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York.
Eddy Fan1 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Mount Sinai Hospital, University Health Network, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hannah Wunsch3 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and.
Niall D Ferguson1 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Mount Sinai Hospital, University Health Network, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Therese A Stukel4 Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon D Rubenfeld3 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and.
Mount Sinai Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAdoption and de-adoption of adjuvant strategies to mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure (ARF), and factors associated with their selection, have not been extensively evaluated.

objectivesTo evaluate change in use of adjuvants to mechanical ventilation for ARF (2008-2013), the impact of landmark publications on adoption and de-adoption, and factors associated with use.

methodsChanges in use of four adjuvants for ARF from 2008 to 2013, the impact of landmark publications on use, and factors associated with use were evaluated with the Premier Database. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), inhaled nitric oxide, inhaled epoprostenol, and continuous neuromuscular blockading agents (cNMBAs) in adult mechanically ventilated patients were identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes and billing data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsAmong 514,913 patients with ARF, 11,567 (2.3%) were treated with at least one adjuvant. cNMBAs were the most frequently used adjuvants (n = 10,073, 2.1% in capable hospitals), followed by inhaled pulmonary vasodilators (n = 1,878, 1.0% in capable hospitals; 58% nitric oxide), and ECMO (n = 195, 0.2% in capable hospitals). There was an increase in ECMO and inhaled epoprostenol over time but no change in nitric oxide or cNMBAs. Segmented regression analysis was used to evaluate whether clinical practice was in accordance with emerging evidence from landmark studies. Using the relevant landmark publication dates, these analyses did not reveal any change in use over time after publication with the exception of inhaled epoprostenol-for which rates of growth decreased over time, possibly in response to the evidence. There was a significant amount of variability in patient and hospital factors associated with use with between adjuvants.

conclusionsBetween 2008 and 2013, there was an increase in use of ECMO and inhaled epoprostenol, and no change in use of inhaled nitric oxide or continuous intravenous infusion of a neuromuscular blocking agent. There was considerable variability in patient and hospital factors associated with use across different adjuvants.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, InhalationAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBronchodilator AgentsCohort StudiesEpoprostenolExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular BlockadeNitric OxideRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeAntihypertensive AgentsBronchodilator AgentsEpoprostenolNitric Oxideacute respiratory distress syndromeepoprostenolextracorporeal membrane oxygenationneuromuscular blockadenitric oxide

Identifiers

PMID27737558
OpenAlexW2530272623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.