Trial reportJAMA oncology2017
Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Capecitabine Efficacy in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the TRIO-013/LOGiC Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00680901 (A Phase III Study for ErbB2 Positive Advanced or Metastatic Gastric, Esophageal, or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Treated With Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin With or Without Lapatinib), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Study for ErbB2 Positive Advanced or Metastatic Gastric, Esophageal, or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Treated With Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin With or Without Lapatinib
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do proton pump inhibitors affect the effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in advanced HR positive, HER2 negative breast cancer? A meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Do proton pump inhibitors affect the effectiveness of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients? A systematic review with meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Acid-suppressive agents and survival outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of capecitabine when used concomitantly with proton pump inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes Associated with Drug-Drug Interactions of Oral Chemotherapeutic Agents: A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Literature Review.Drugs & aging · 2019Pooled it
- Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Phase III Trial (AXEPT).The oncologist · 2021Trial
- The impact of concomitant medications on treatment outcomes in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- The symbiotic axis between the acidic tumor microenvironment and cancer stem cells: a driver of malignancy and therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Proton pump inhibitors and all-cause mortality in colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multiplex Spatial Proteomic Analysis of HER2-Positive Breast Tumors Reveals Unique Molecular and Immunologic Features Associated With Treatment Response.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Concomitant proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: an ancillary study from the PRODIGE 23 trial.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Proton pump inhibitors reduce survival outcomes in patients treated with capecitabine: meta-analysis.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Review
- Observational
- Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients With Breast Cancer.The oncologist · 2024Observational
- Hand-foot syndrome in cancer patients on capecitabine: examining prevalence, impacts, and associated risk factors at a cancer centre in Malaysia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Review
- Drug-drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors in cancer patients: an underrecognized cause of treatment failure.ESMO open · 2023Review
- Influence of proton pump inhibitors on the pathological response of rectal cancer: a multicentre study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceCapecitabine is an oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic commonly used across cancer subtypes. As with other oral medications though, it may suffer from drug interactions that could impair its absorption.
objectiveTo determine if gastric acid suppressants such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may impair capecitabine efficacy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis secondary analysis of TRIO-013, a phase III randomized trial, compares capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) with or without lapatinib in 545 patients with ERBB2/HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (GEC); patients were randomized 1:1 between CapeOx with or without lapatinib. Proton pump inhibitor use was identified by medication records. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients treated with PPIs vs patients who were not. Specific subgroups were accounted for, such as younger age (<60 years), Asian ethnicity, female sex, and disease stage (metastatic/advanced) in multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. The TRIO-013 trial accrued and randomized patients between June 2008 and January 2012; this analysis took place in January 2014.
interventionsPatients were divided based on PPI exposure. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary study outcome was PFS and OS between patients treated with PPIs vs patients who were not. Secondary outcomes included disease response rates and toxicities.
resultsOf the 545 patients with GEC (median age, 60 years; 406 men [74%]) included in the study, 229 received PPIs (42.0%) and were evenly distributed between arms. In the placebo arm, PPI-treated patients had poorer median PFS, 4.2 vs 5.7 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.29-1.81, P < .001); OS, 9.2 vs 11.3 months (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.62; P = .04); and disease control rate (83% vs 72%; P = .02) vs patients not treated with PPIs. In multivariate analysis considering age, race, disease stage, and sex, PPI-treated patients had poorer PFS (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.42-1.94; P < .001) and OS (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-1.71; P = .001). In patients treated with CapeOx and lapatinib, PPIs had less effect on PFS (HR, 1.08; P = .54) and OS (HR, 1.26; P = .10); however, multivariate analysis in this group demonstrated a significant difference in OS (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.66; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Proton pump inhibitors negatively effected capecitabine efficacy by possibly raising gastric pH levels, leading to altered dissolution and absorption. These results are consistent with previous erlotinib and sunitinib studies. Whether PPIs affected lapatinib is unclear given concurrent capecitabine. Given capecitabine's prevalence in treatment breast cancer and colon cancer, further studies are under way.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00680901.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.