ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Forgetting in Reinforcement Learning Links Sustained Dopamine Signals to Motivation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whom do we prefer to learn from in observational reinforcement learning?PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Striatal Gradient in Value-Decay Explains Regional Differences in Dopamine Patterns and Reinforcement Learning Computations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Explaining dopamine through prediction errors and beyond.Nature neuroscience · 2024Review
- Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Opponent learning with different representations in the cortico-basal ganglia pathways can develop obsession-compulsion cycle.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Opponent Learning with Different Representations in the Cortico-Basal Ganglia Circuits.eNeuro · 2023Article
- Reinforcement learning with associative or discriminative generalization across states and actions: fMRI at 3 T and 7 T.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Phasic Dopamine Changes and Hebbian Mechanisms during Probabilistic Reversal Learning in Striatal Circuits: A Computational Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Dopamine firing plays a dual role in coding reward prediction errors and signaling motivation in a working memory task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Implicit Counterfactual Effect in Partial Feedback Reinforcement Learning: Behavioral and Modeling Approach.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Psychiatric symptoms influence reward-seeking and loss-avoidance decision-making through common and distinct computational processes.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2021Article
- Rigid reduced successor representation as a potential mechanism for addiction.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Article
- Revisiting the importance of model fitting for model-based fMRI: It does matter in computational psychiatry.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Understanding Procrastination: Does Inaccurate Value Approximation Cause Irrational Postponing of a Task?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Dopamine release, diffusion and uptake: A computational model for synaptic and volume transmission.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Dopamine role in learning and action inference.eLife · 2020Article
- Variability in Action Selection Relates to Striatal Dopamine 2/3 Receptor Availability in Humans: A PET Neuroimaging Study Using Reinforcement Learning and Active Inference Models.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020Article
- Non-action Learning: Saving Action-Associated Cost Serves as a Covert Reward.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been suggested that dopamine (DA) represents reward-prediction-error (RPE) defined in reinforcement learning and therefore DA responds to unpredicted but not predicted reward. However, recent studies have found DA response sustained towards predictable reward in tasks involving self-paced behavior, and suggested that this response represents a motivational signal. We have previously shown that RPE can sustain if there is decay/forgetting of learned-values, which can be implemented as decay of synaptic strengths storing learned-values. This account, however, did not explain the suggested link between tonic/sustained DA and motivation. In the present work, we explored the motivational effects of the value-decay in self-paced approach behavior, modeled as a series of 'Go' or 'No-Go' selections towards a goal. Through simulations, we found that the value-decay can enhance motivation, specifically, facilitate fast goal-reaching, albeit counterintuitively. Mathematical analyses revealed that underlying potential mechanisms are twofold: (1) decay-induced sustained RPE creates a gradient of 'Go' values towards a goal, and (2) value-contrasts between 'Go' and 'No-Go' are generated because while chosen values are continually updated, unchosen values simply decay. Our model provides potential explanations for the key experimental findings that suggest DA's roles in motivation: (i) slowdown of behavior by post-training blockade of DA signaling, (ii) observations that DA blockade severely impairs effortful actions to obtain rewards while largely sparing seeking of easily obtainable rewards, and (iii) relationships between the reward amount, the level of motivation reflected in the speed of behavior, and the average level of DA. These results indicate that reinforcement learning with value-decay, or forgetting, provides a parsimonious mechanistic account for the DA's roles in value-learning and motivation. Our results also suggest that when biological systems for value-learning are active even though learning has apparently converged, the systems might be in a state of dynamic equilibrium, where learning and forgetting are balanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.