Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27736763›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Using MRSA Screening Tests To Predict Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Guillaume Butler-Laporte, Matthew P Cheng, Alexandre P Cheng, Emily G McDonald, Todd C Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of nares swab to de-escalate vancomycin for patients with suspected methicillin-resistantAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023
    Article
  2. Epidemiology of Community-OnsetThe western journal of emergency medicine · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume Butler-LaporteDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada guillaume.butler-laporte@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-0396
Matthew P ChengDepartment of Microbiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alexandre P ChengÉcole Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Emily G McDonaldDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Todd C LeeDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CAPolytechnique Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bloodstream infections with Staphylococcus aureus are clinically significant and are often treated with empirical methicillin resistance (MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus) coverage. However, vancomycin has associated harms. We hypothesized that MRSA screening correlated with resistance in S. aureus bacteremia and could help determine the requirement for empirical vancomycin therapy. We reviewed consecutive S. aureus bacteremias over a 5-year period at two tertiary care hospitals. MRSA colonization was evaluated in three ways: as tested within 30 days of bacteremia (30-day criterion), as tested within 30 days but accounting for any prior positive results (ever-positive criterion), or as tested in known-positive patients, with patients with unknown MRSA status being labeled negative (known-positive criterion). There were 409 S. aureus bacteremias: 302 (73.8%) methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 107 (26.2%) MRSA bacteremias. In the 167 patients with MSSA bacteremias, 7.2% had a positive MRSA test within 30 days. Of 107 patients with MRSA bacteremia, 68 were tested within 30 days (54 positive; 79.8%), and another 21 (19.6%) were previously positive. The 30-day criterion provided negative predictive values (NPV) exceeding 90% and 95% if the prevalence of MRSA in S. aureus bacteremia was less than 33.4% and 19.2%, respectively. The same NPVs were predicted at MRSA proportions below 39.7% and 23.8%, respectively, for the ever-positive criterion and 34.4% and 19.9%, respectively, for the known-positive criterion. In MRSA-colonized patients, positive predictive values exceeded 50% at low prevalence. MRSA screening could help avoid empirical vancomycin therapy and its complications in stable patients and settings with low-to-moderate proportions of MRSA bacteremia.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaHumansMethicillinMethicillin ResistanceMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPredictive Value of TestsQuebecRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsTertiary Care CentersVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID27736763
PMCPMC5119028
OpenAlexW2531729500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.