Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27736086›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2016

Interfacing Membrane Mimetics with Mass Spectrometry.

Michael T Marty, Kin Kuan Hoi, Carol V Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dissecting the structural heterogeneity of proteins by native mass spectrometry.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Deconvolving Native and Intact Protein Mass Spectra with UniDec.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry reveals the role of peripheral myelin protein dimers in peripheral neuropathy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Nanodiscs and Mass Spectrometry: Making Membranes Fly.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael T MartyDepartment of Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford , South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, U.K.
Kin Kuan HoiDepartment of Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford , South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, U.K.
Carol V RobinsonDepartment of Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford , South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, U.K.

Funding

European Research Council 695511Medical Research Council G1000819Wellcome Trust 104633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane proteins play critical physiological roles and make up the majority of drug targets. Due to their generally low expression levels and amphipathic nature, membrane proteins represent challenging molecular entities for biophysical study. Mass spectrometry offers several sensitive approaches to study the biophysics of membrane proteins. By preserving noncovalent interactions in the gas phase and using collisional activation to remove solubilization agents inside the mass spectrometer, native mass spectrometry (MS) is capable of studying isolated assemblies that would be insoluble in aqueous solution, such as membrane protein oligomers and protein-lipid complexes. Conventional methods use detergent to solubilize the protein prior to electrospray ionization. Gas-phase activation inside the mass spectrometer removes the detergent to yield the isolated proteins with bound ligands. This approach has proven highly successful for ionizing membrane proteins. With the appropriate choice of detergents, membrane proteins with bound lipid species can be observed, which allows characterization of protein-lipid interactions. However, detergents have several limitations. They do not necessarily replicate the native lipid bilayer environment, and only a small number of protein-lipid interactions can be resolved. In this Account, we summarize the development of different membrane mimetics as cassettes for MS analysis of membrane proteins. Examples include amphipols, bicelles, and picodiscs with a special emphasis on lipoprotein nanodiscs. Polydispersity and heterogeneity of the membrane mimetic cassette is a critical issue for study by MS. Ever more complex data sets consisting of overlapping protein charge states and multiple lipid-bound entities have required development of new computational, theoretical, and experimental approaches to interpret both mass and ion mobility spectra. We will present the rationale and limitations of these approaches. Starting with the early work on empty nanodiscs, we chart developments that culminate in recent high-resolution studies of membrane protein-lipid complexes ejected from nanodiscs. For the latter, increasing collision energies allowed progressive removal of nanodisc components, beginning with the scaffold proteins and continuing through successive shells of lipids, allowing direct characterization of the stoichiometry of the annular lipid belt that surrounds the membrane protein. We consider future directions for the study of membrane proteins in membrane mimetics, including the development of mixed lipid systems and native bilayer environments. Unambiguous assignment of these heterogeneous systems will rely heavily upon further enhancements in both data analysis protocols and instrumental resolution. We anticipate that these developments will provide new insights into the factors that control dynamic protein-lipid interactions in a variety of tailored and natural lipid environments.

Indexed as

DetergentsLipid BilayersMass SpectrometryMembrane ProteinsNanostructuresPolymersDetergentsLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID27736086
PMCPMC5328410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.