ArticleThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2017
High-Dose Citalopram and Escitalopram and the Risk of Out-of-Hospital Death.
Article in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of antidepressant therapy for the agitation of dementia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- The Association Between Antidepressant Treatment and Heart Rate Deceleration Capacity in Patients With Mood disorders-A Potential New Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Article
- Risk of Death at 1 Year Following Postpartum Opioid Exposure.American journal of perinatology · 2024Article
- Drug-induced Sudden Death: A Scoping Review.Current drug safety · 2023Article
- Serious arrhythmia in initiators of citalopram, escitalopram, and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A population-based cohort study in older adults.Clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Repurposing non-oncology small-molecule drugs to improve cancer therapy: Current situation and future directions.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2022Review
- Effects of antidepressants on QT interval in people with mental disorders.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2020Review
- A review of citalopram dose restrictions in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders in older adults.The mental health clinician · 2019Article
- Risk of Cardiac Events Associated With Antidepressant Therapy in Patients With Long QT Syndrome.The American journal of cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveStudies demonstrating that higher doses of citalopram (> 40 mg) and escitalopram (> 20 mg) prolong the corrected QT interval prompted regulatory agency warnings, which are controversial, given the absence of confirmatory clinical outcome studies. We compared the risk of potential arrhythmia-related deaths for high doses of these selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to that for equivalent doses of fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.
methodsThe Tennessee Medicaid retrospective cohort study included 54,220 persons 30-74 years of age without cancer or other life-threatening illness who were prescribed high-dose SSRIs from 1998 through 2011. The mean age was 47 years, and 76% were female. Demographic characteristics and comorbidity for individual SSRIs were comparable. Because arrhythmia-related deaths are typically sudden and occur outside the hospital, we analyzed out-of-hospital sudden unexpected death as well as sudden cardiac deaths, a more specific indicator of proarrhythmic effects.
resultsThe adjusted risk of sudden unexpected death for citalopram did not differ significantly from that for the other SSRIs. The respective hazard ratios (HRs) for citalopram versus escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.40-1.75), 1.24 (95% CI, 0.75-2.05), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.45-1.24), and 1.53 (95% CI, 0.91-2.55). There were no significant differences for sudden cardiac death or all study deaths, nor were there significant differences among high-risk patients (≥ 60 years of age, upper quartile baseline cardiovascular risk). Escitalopram users had no significantly increased risk for any study end point.
conclusionsWe found no evidence that risk of sudden unexpected death, sudden cardiac death, or total mortality for high-dose citalopram and escitalopram differed significantly from that for comparable doses of fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.