Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27735790›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2017

Poultry Consumption and Arsenic Exposure in the U.S. Population.

Anne E Nigra, Keeve E Nachman, David C Love, Maria Grau-Perez, Ana Navas-Acien

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbial genomics · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A State-of-the-Science Review on Metal Biomarkers.Current environmental health reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Monitoring of metal content in the tissues of wild boar (Sus scrofa) and its food safety aspect.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  13. Epigenomic reprogramming in iAs-mediated carcinogenesis.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne E NigraDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
Keeve E Nachman
David C Love
Maria Grau-Perez
Ana Navas-Acien
Center for Environmental Health · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Supplemental Training in Making Data FAIR and AI/ML ReadyT32ES007322 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Pam R Factor-Litvak, Allison Kupsco · 2000 to 2026
$12.1M
Arsenic Exposure, Genetic Determinants and Diabetes Risk in a Family StudyR01ES021367 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NAVAS-ACIEN, ANA, VAIDYA, DHANANJAY MADHUKAR · 2012 to 2015
$2.4M
Arsenic, Epigenetics and Incident Cardiovascular Disease in American IndiansR01ES025216 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FALLIN, M DANIELE, NAVAS-ACIEN, ANA · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021367NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025216NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArsenicals (roxarsone and nitarsone) used in poultry production likely increase inorganic arsenic (iAs), monomethylarsonic acid (MMA), dimethylarsinic acid (DMA), and roxarsone or nitarsone concentrations in poultry meat. However, the association between poultry intake and exposure to these arsenic species, as reflected in elevated urinary arsenic concentrations, is unknown.

objectivesOur aim was to evaluate the association between 24-hr dietary recall of poultry consumption and arsenic exposure in the U.S. population. We hypothesized first, that poultry intake would be associated with higher urine arsenic concentrations and second, that the association between turkey intake and increased urine arsenic concentrations would be modified by season, reflecting seasonal use of nitarsone.

methodsWe evaluated 3,329 participants ≥ 6 years old from the 2003-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with urine arsenic available and undetectable urine arsenobetaine levels. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) of urine total arsenic and DMA were compared across increasing levels of poultry intake.

resultsAfter adjustment, participants in the highest quartile of poultry consumption had urine total arsenic 1.12 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.22) and DMA 1.13 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.20) times higher than nonconsumers. During the fall/winter, participants in the highest quartile of turkey intake had urine total arsenic and DMA 1.17 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.39;

conclusionsPoultry intake was associated with increased urine total arsenic and DMA in NHANES 2003-2010, reflecting arsenic exposure. Seasonally stratified analyses by poultry type provide strong suggestive evidence that the historical use of arsenic-based poultry drugs contributed to arsenic exposure in the U.S. CITATION: Nigra AE, Nachman KE, Love DC, Grau-Perez M, Navas-Acien A. 2017. Poultry consumption and arsenic exposure in the U.S. Environ Health Perspect 125:370-377; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP351.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsArsenicArsenicalsCacodylic AcidChildDietEnvironmental ExposureFood ContaminationHumansMeatMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysArsenicArsenicalsCacodylic Acidnitarsone

Identifiers

PMID27735790
PMCPMC5332189
OpenAlexW2530769330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.