Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27735065›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Spironolactone use and risk of incident cancers: a retrospective, matched cohort study.

Isla S Mackenzie, Steven V Morant, Li Wei, Alastair M Thompson, Thomas M MacDonald

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antihypertensive Therapy and Incidence of Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Embryologic and hormonal contributors to prostate cancer in transgender women.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isla S MackenzieMedicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO), Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Steven V MorantMedicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO), Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Li WeiSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Alastair M ThompsonDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, FCT7.6092, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.
Thomas M MacDonaldMedicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO), Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
University of Dundee · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G106/1249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSpironolactone is widely used to treat heart failure, hypertension and liver disease with increased usage in recent years. Spironolactone has endocrine effects that could influence cancer risks and historical reports suggest possible links with increased risk of certain types of cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of spironolactone exposure on cancer incidence.

methodsA pharmacoepidemiological propensity score-matched cohort study was performed to assess the effect of spironolactone exposure on cancer incidence. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse time to first diagnosis of each prespecified cancer and hazard ratios for spironolactone exposure are presented. The setting for the study was UK primary care using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The participants were 74 272 patients exposed to spironolactone between 1986 and 2013, matched 1:2 with unexposed controls. The prespecified primary outcomes were the first incidence of ovarian, endometrial, pancreatic, colorectal, prostate, renal cell, pharyngeal and thyroid cancers, and myelomonoblastic/-cytic leukaemias. Secondary outcomes were the remaining 27 types of cancer.

resultsThere was no evidence of an increased risk of any cancer associated with spironolactone use. Spironolactone use was associated with a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer (hazard ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.80, P < 0.001).

conclusionsIn this study, spironolactone use was associated with a lower incidence of prostate cancer, the most common cancer in men in the UK. The possible mechanisms and clinical implications merit further investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPharmacoepidemiologyProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpironolactoneUnited KingdomSpironolactonecancercohort studypharmacoepidemiologyprostatespironolactone

Identifiers

PMID27735065
PMCPMC5306481
OpenAlexW2536818857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.