ArticleNanoscale2016
Mito-magneto: a tool for nanoparticle mediated mitochondria isolation.
Article in Nanoscale, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial Metabolomics in Cancer: Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches for Metabolic Rewiring Analysis and Therapeutic Discovery.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Isolation of yeast mitochondria by affinity purification using magnetic beads.Methods in enzymology · 2024Article
- Machine learning assisted-nanomedicine using magnetic nanoparticles for central nervous system diseases.Nanoscale advances · 2023Review
- Intersection of Inorganic Chemistry and Nanotechnology for the Creation of New Cancer Therapies.Accounts of materials research · 2022Article
- Recent advances, status, and opportunities of magneto-electric nanocarriers for biomedical applications.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2022Review
- Macrophage-targeted nanomedicine for the diagnosis and management of atherosclerosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Mitochondrial isolation: when size matters.Wellcome open research · 2020Review
- Isolation of mitochondria from cells and tissues.Methods in cell biology · 2020Article
- Isolation of mitochondria from Saccharomyces cerevisiae using magnetic bead affinity purification.PloS one · 2018Article
- Centrifugation-Free Magnetic Isolation of Functional Mitochondria Using Paramagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.Current protocols in cell biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of intracellular organelle targeting using nanoparticle (NP) is mushrooming rapidly. Thus, the area of nanotechnology-enabled targeting of mitochondrion, the cellular powerhouse, for diseases characterized by mitochondrial dysfunctions such as cancer, diseases of the central nervous system, and cardiovascular diseases is also growing at a rapid pace. Optimization of a NP's ability to target the mitochondria requires quantification of the particles in this subcellular organelle and isolation of mitochondria from the cells. Conventional gradient centrifugation used in currently available methods may not be appropriate for NP containing mitochondria isolation as these particles undergo Brownian motion under centrifugal forces yielding irreproducible results. There is only one method for centrifugation-free mitochondria isolation; however, this method requires immunoprecipitation. Thus, a reliable centrifugation and immunoprecipitation free method is urgently needed to support this growing field of nanotechnology-based mitochondria targeting. Here, we report a mitochondria-targeted magnetic NP, Mito-magneto, to avoid centrifugation and immunoprecipitation methods for isolation of functional, respiration active pure mitochondria, which can be used to analyze and quantify mitochondria targeting properties of various NPs as an important tool for the growing field of "mitochondrial nanomedicine".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.