ArticleScientific reports2016
Comparison of overall survival in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases with or without transarterial chemoembolization: A Propensity Score Matching Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Ensuring continuity of patient care across the healthcare interface: Telephone follow-up post-hospitalization.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has mostly been used in hypervascular tumours such as hepatocellular carcinoma, and may be an effective palliative treatment in patients with metastatic liver cancer. Our goal is to determine whether TACE increases overall survival (OS) of in patients with liver metastases. The retrospective cohort study included 171 patients with liver metastases diagnosed between 2001 and 2015. OS was compared between the TACE and non-TACE groups after propensity score matching to reduce the effects of selection bias and potential confounders. Multivariate analysis was conducted to confirm the confounding factors with OS. After excluding 43 patients, 128 patients were analysed and among thses 64 patients (50%) were included in the TACE group. In the propensity score matched cohort (42 pairs), the OS was non-significantly longer in the TACE group than in the non-TACE group (p = 0.789). Multivariate analysis revealed that international normalized ratio (INR) (HR 0.058, 95%CI: [0.005, 0.681]; p = 0.023) and Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (HR 3.054, 95%CI: [1.418, 6.579]; p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for OS in patients with unresectable liver metastases. There were no significant differences in patients with unresectable liver metastases with or without TACE. INR and RFA can significantly affect OS in patients with unresectable liver metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.