Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27734567›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2016

Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?

A Miglio, V Stefanetti, M T Antognoni, K Cappelli, S Capomaccio, M Coletti, F Passamonti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Case report: First autochthonousFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  3. Omics Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: Literature Review and Perspectives in Transfusion Medicine.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fluids of the Future.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A MiglioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
V StefanettiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
M T AntognoniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
K CappelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
S CapomaccioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
M ColettiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
F PassamontiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial contamination of whole blood (WB) units can result in transfusion-transmitted infection, but the extent of the risk has not been established and may be underestimated in veterinary medicine.

objectivesTo detect, quantify, and identify bacterial microorganisms in 49 canine WB units during their shelf life. ANIMALS: Forty-nine healthy adult dogs.

methodsForty-nine WB units were included in the study. Immediately after collection, 8 sterile samples from the tube segment line of each unit were aseptically collected and tested for bacterial contamination on days 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 of storage. A qPCR assay was performed on days 0, 21, and 35 to identify and quantify any bacterial DNA.

resultsOn bacterial culture, 47/49 blood units were negative at all time points tested, 1 unit was positive for Enterococcus spp. on days 0 and 1, and 1 was positive for Escherichia coli on day 35. On qPCR assay, 26 of 49 blood units were positive on at least 1 time point and the bacterial loads of the sequences detected (Propionobacterium spp., Corynebacterium spp., Caulobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Enterococcus spp., Serratia spp., and Leucobacter spp.) were <80 genome equivalents (GE)/μL. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Most of the organisms detected were common bacteria, not usually implicated in septic transfusion reactions. The very low number of GE detected constitutes an acceptable risk of bacterial contamination, indicating that WB units have a good sanitary shelf life during commercial storage.

Indexed as

AnimalsBloodBlood PreservationBlood SafetyDNA, BacterialDogsEnterococcusEscherichia coliReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTime FactorsDNA, BacterialBacterial contaminationBlood transfusionCanineStored blood units

Identifiers

PMID27734567
PMCPMC5115181
OpenAlexW2529894317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.