ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2016
Molecular Testing in Patients with Suspected Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic utility of targeted gene panel sequencing in discriminating etiologies of cytopenia.American journal of hematology · 2019Trial
- Epigenomic insights and computational advances in hematologic malignancies.Molecular cytogenetics · 2025Review
- Getting personal with myelodysplastic syndromes: is now the right time?Expert review of hematology · 2019Review
- Co-occurrence of RUNX1 and ASXL1 mutations underlie poor response and outcome for MDS patients treated with HMAs.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
- [High throughput sequencing combined with DNA-PCR for detection of 51 kinds of hematologic malignancy related gene mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of clonal hematologic malignancies characterized by a hypercellular bone marrow and morphologic dysplasia in one or more lineage (i.e., myeloid, erythroid, or megakaryocytic), presenting clinically with leukopenia, anemia, and/or thrombocytopenia and with a propensity to transform to acute myelogenous leukemia. Newer technologies such as next-generation sequencing have allowed better understanding of the genetic landscape in MDS. Nearly 80 % of MDS patients have at least one mutation, and approximately 40 recurrent somatic mutations have been identified to occur in >1 % of cases. Many of these mutations are relevant for prognosis, help with selection of therapy, and/or have specific targeted treatment options. In this article, we will explore the impact of molecular testing on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions in patients with suspected MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.