Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27734253›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2017

A Novel Unsupervised Segmentation Approach Quantifies Tumor Tissue Populations Using Multiparametric MRI: First Results with Histological Validation.

Prateek Katiyar, Mathew R Divine, Ursula Kohlhofer, Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez, Bernhard Schölkopf, Bernd J Pichler, Jonathan A Disselhorst

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in PET imaging of cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Linking imaging to omics utilizing image-guided tissue extraction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Prateek KatiyarWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Roentgenweg 13, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. prateek.katiyar@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3062-9366
Mathew R DivineWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Roentgenweg 13, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ursula KohlhoferInstitute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Leticia Quintanilla-MartinezInstitute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Bernhard SchölkopfMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tuebingen, Germany.
Bernd J PichlerWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Roentgenweg 13, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Jonathan A DisselhorstWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Roentgenweg 13, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Siemens (Germany) · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems · DE

Funding

European Research Council 323196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to precisely estimate intra-tumoral heterogeneity using spatially regularized spectral clustering (SRSC) on multiparametric MRI data and compare the efficacy of SRSC with the previously reported segmentation techniques in MRI studies. PROCEDURES: Six NMRI nu/nu mice bearing subcutaneous human glioblastoma U87 MG tumors were scanned using a dedicated small animal 7T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. The data consisted of T2 weighted images, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and pre- and post-contrast T2 and T2* maps. Following each scan, the tumors were excised into 2-3-mm thin slices parallel to the axial field of view and processed for histological staining. The MRI data were segmented using SRSC, K-means, fuzzy C-means, and Gaussian mixture modeling to estimate the fractional population of necrotic, peri-necrotic, and viable regions and validated with the fractional population obtained from histology.

resultsWhile the aforementioned methods overestimated peri-necrotic and underestimated viable fractions, SRSC accurately predicted the fractional population of all three tumor tissue types and exhibited strong correlations (r

conclusionsThe precise identification of necrotic, peri-necrotic and viable areas using SRSC may greatly assist in cancer treatment planning and add a new dimension to MRI-guided tumor biopsy procedures.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCluster AnalysisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMice, NudeNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorFuzzy C-meansGaussian mixture modelingK-meansMultiparametric MRISpectral clusteringTumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID27734253
PMCPMC5332060
OpenAlexW2530382854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.