ArticleAIDS and behavior2017
The Role of Civil Society Organizations in Monitoring the Global AIDS Response.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmet needs and new challenges in young women's sexual and reproductive health and rights: a qualitative study in Chile's Metropolitan Region.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Resources for oral health in Africa.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- How far are we? Assessing progress in hepatitis C response towards the WHO 2030 elimination goals by the civil society monitoring in 25 European countries, period 2020 to 2023.Harm reduction journal · 2024Article
- Reduction in time to viral suppression among persons living with HIV in Jamaica between 2017-2019.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Overcoming Stigma: The Human Side of Monkeypox Virus.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Integrating animal welfare into the WHO pandemic treaty: a thematic analysis of civil society perspectives and comparison with treaty drafting.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- The role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in the COVID-19 response across the Global South: A multinational, qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- A Needle in a Haystack? Human Rights Framing at the World Trade Organization for Access to COVID-19 Vaccines.Health and human rights · 2022Article
- The civil society monitoring of hepatitis C response related to the WHO 2030 elimination goals in 35 European countries.Harm reduction journal · 2020Article
- The Hep-CORE policy score: A European hepatitis C national policy implementation ranking based on patient organization data.PloS one · 2020Article
- Defining rights-based indicators for HIV epidemic transition.PLoS medicine · 2018Review
- How Twitter Can Support the HIV/AIDS Response to Achieve the 2030 Eradication Goal: In-Depth Thematic Analysis of World AIDS Day Tweets.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2018Article
- Civil society in global health policymaking: a critical review.Globalization and health · 2018Review
- Global AIDS Reporting-2001 to 2015: Lessons for Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals.AIDS and behavior · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Civil society organizations (CSOs) are recognized as playing an exceptional role in the global AIDS response. However, there is little detailed research to date on how they contribute to specific governance functions. This article uses Haas' framework on global governance functions to map CSO's participation in the monitoring of global commitments to the AIDS response by institutions and states. Drawing on key informant interviews and primary documents, it focuses specifically on CSO participation in Global AIDS Response Progress Reporting and in Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria processes. It argues that the AIDS response is unique within global health governance, in that CSOs fulfill both formal and informal monitoring functions, and considers the strengths and weaknesses of these contributions. It concludes that future global health governance arrangements should include provisions and resources for monitoring by CSOs because their participation creates more inclusive global health governance and contributes to strengthening commitments to human rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.