Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27734132›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

Bowel function in patients with urinary diversion: a gender-matched comparison of continent urinary diversion with the ileocecal pouch and ileal conduit.

S Frees, A C Schenk, P Rubenwolf, C Ziesel, W Jaeger, J W Thüroff, R Stein

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S FreesDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. sebastian.frees@unimedizin-mainz.de.
A C SchenkDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
P RubenwolfDepartment of Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
C ZieselDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
W JaegerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
J W ThüroffDepartment of Urology and Pediatric, University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany.
R SteinDepartment of Adolescent Urology, University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate stool habits and associated quality of life (QoL) in a matched pair analysis of patients who underwent continent cutaneous diversion using the ileocecal segment [Mainz pouch I (MzPI)] with an intussuscepted ileal nipple as efferent segment with those receiving an ileal conduit (IC) after radical cystectomy.

methodsWe identified 250 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (UD) with either MzPI with an ileal nipple or IC in our database. A detailed history of stool habits using the modified Wexner score was obtained, and questions addressing general lifestyle, comparison of symptom differences before and after surgery considering bowel function as well as bowel-associated QoL were assessed.

resultsForty-five age- and sex-matched pairs could be compared. Overall, stool incontinence (p = 0.481) and the Wexner score (p = 0.464) revealed no differences between both groups. However, patients with MzPI as compared to those with IC had significant higher rates of stool frequency (53 vs 31 %), softer stool consistencies (60 vs 13 %), diarrhea (62 vs 20 %) and a lower rate of constipation (4 vs 22 %). Patients with MzPI had a trend toward lower bowel-associated QoL compared with patients with IC. Similarly, the MzPI group reported a significantly impaired overall postoperative QoL (51 %) compared to the IC group (29 %) (p = 0.024).

conclusionsPatients following UD by MzPI have an increased stool frequency and softer stool consistency. However, there is no difference between both groups in terms of de novo stool incontinence. Change in bowel habits should be part of preoperative informed consent in any kind of UD. Careful patient selection is of paramount importance.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeUrinary Reservoirs, ContinentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesConstipationCystectomyFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesBowel functionIleal conduitMainz pouch IQuality of lifeUrinary diversion

Identifiers

PMID27734132
OpenAlexW2531224560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.