Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27734078›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2017

Transanal Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Wen-Tao Zhao, Ning-Ning Li, Dan He, Jin-Yan Feng

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transanal Intubation for Preventing Colorectal Anastomotic Failure.International journal of surgical oncology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Tao ZhaoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 16 Airport Road, Guangzhou, 510405, China. zhao_wen_tao@yeah.net.
Ning-Ning LiDepartment of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Dan HeDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu, China.
Jin-Yan FengDepartment of General Surgery, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Chengdu Second People's Hospital · CNGuangzhou University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNTibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransanal tubes (TTs) have been used to prevent and reduce anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this review was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the TT.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of TTs in rectal cancer surgery.

resultsSeven trials with 1609 participants were included. The TT group had a lower anastomotic leakage rate than the non-transanal tube group [RR 0.38; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.58; P < 0.0001], as well as a lower reoperation rate (RR 0.31; 95 % CI 0.19-0.53; P < 0.0001) and a shorter hospital stay (mean = -2.59 days; 95 % CI -3.69 to -1.49; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in mortality between the two groups.

conclusionTT use in rectal cancer surgery is likely to be an effective and safe method of preventing and reducing anastomotic leakage and is associated with a decreased risk of reoperation and faster recovery.

Indexed as

Anal CanalAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakDrainageHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsReoperation

Identifiers

PMID27734078
OpenAlexW2530365879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.