ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2016
Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative.
Abstract readReview
In one paragraph
Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The efficacy and safety of simethicone for gastrointestinal preparation prior to pediatric endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Quality Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: A Joint Position Statement.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Guideline
- Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement.United European gastroenterology journal · 2021Guideline
- AGA Technical Review on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia-Epidemiology and Risk Factors.Gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Guideline
- Endoscopic Evaluation of the Gastroesophageal Junction and Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus.Digestion · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted esophagogastroduodenoscopy improves procedure quality for endoscopists in early stages of training.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Performance of the National Cancer Screening Program for Gastric Cancer in Korea.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024Review
- Esophageal cancers missed at upper endoscopy in Central Norway 2004 to 2021 - A population-based study.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Quality indicators in Barrett's endoscopy: Best is yet to come.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2024Review
- Latest Advances in Endoscopic Detection of Oesophageal and Gastric Neoplasia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Outcomes Variated by the Time of the Day: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Complications of diagnostic upper Gastrointestinal endoscopy: common and rare - recognition, assessment and management.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Endoscopic diagnosis and screening of Barrett's esophagus: Inconsistency of diagnostic criteria between Japan and Western countries.DEN open · 2022Review
- Index diagnoses of gastric intestinal metaplasia in the United States: patient characteristics, endoscopic findings, and clinical practice patterns at a large tertiary care center.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Advances in the Aetiology & Endoscopic Detection and Management of Early Gastric Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- Recent advances in the detection and management of early gastric cancer and its precursors.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Gastroscopy Should Come Before Colonoscopy Using COJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- What Is Appropriate Upper Endoscopic Interval Among Dyspeptic Patients With Previously Normal Endoscopy? A Multicenter Study With Bayesian Change Point Analysis.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019Article
- Endoscopic Upper GI Screening.Visceral medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Raf BisschopsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Miguel AreiaGastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal; Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Emmanuel CoronInstitut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Daniela DobruGastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Targu Mures, Romania.
Bernd KaskasDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Roman KuvaevEndoscopy, Yaroslavl Regional Cancer Hospital, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation.
Oliver PechKlinik für Gastroenterologie und interventionelle Endoskopie, Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Krish RagunathNIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Bas WeustenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Pietro FamiliariDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Dirk DomagkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Joseph's Hospital, Warendorf, Germany.
Roland ValoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK.
Michal F KaminskiDepartment of Health Management and Health Economy and KG Jebsen Centre for Colorectal Cancer, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, and Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Cristiano SpadaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Michael BretthauerDepartment of Health Management and Health Economy and KG Jebsen Centre for Colorectal Cancer, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Cathy BennettCentre for Technology Enabled Research, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Carlo SenoreCPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Mário Dinis-RibeiroCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Servicio de Gastroenterologia, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal.
Matthew D RutterDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK; School of Medicine, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Gastroscopypatient safetyperformance measuresqualityquality indicators
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390
Registered trials
None linked
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.