Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27733770›Full record

SynthesisHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2017

Effects of milk proteins on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Khemayanto Hidayat, Hong-Zhen Du, Jing Yang, Guo-Chong Chen, Zheng Zhang, Zeng-Ning Li, Li-Qiang Qin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Khemayanto HidayatDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hong-Zhen DuDepartment of Nutrition, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jing YangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Guo-Chong ChenDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zheng ZhangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zeng-Ning LiDepartment of Nutrition, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Li-Qiang QinDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Soochow University · CNHebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain foods or their components are widely used in the prevention and/or management of cardiovascular disease. Milk proteins have been suggested to have hypotensive properties. A number of clinical trials have been carried out to evaluate the effect of milk proteins from whole foods and supplements on blood pressure (BP). However, the effect of milk proteins on BP is not well understood. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized control trials to provide insight into and robust evidence concerning the overall impact of milk proteins on BP. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for literature concerning the effects of milk proteins on BP up to May 2016. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals of effect sizes. The final analysis included seven randomized control trials involving 412 participants. Overall, milk protein interventions significantly lowered systolic BP by -3.33 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -5.62, -1.03) and diastolic BP by -1.08 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -3.38, -0.22). There was no statistical evidence of publication bias across the studies. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides further evidence that milk proteins slightly but significantly lower both systolic and diastolic BP.

Indexed as

Milk ProteinsBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationDietary SupplementsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMilk Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27733770
OpenAlexW2531052508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.