Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27733631›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Help in the Choice of Automated or Semiautomated Immunoassays for Serological Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis: Evaluation of Nine Immunoassays by the French National Reference Center for Toxoplasmosis.

O Villard, B Cimon, C L'Ollivier, H Fricker-Hidalgo, N Godineau, S Houze, L Paris, H Pelloux, I Villena, E Candolfi

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Performances of ICT Toxoplasma IgG-IgM test in comparison with Vidas® toxo competition to determine the immune status against Toxoplasma gondii.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. One Health Approach in Serosurvey ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  7. Serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in pregnancy: comparison between a manual commercial ELISA assay and the automated VIDASEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Screening for the Detection ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Human Seroprevalence to 11 Zoonotic Pathogens in the U.S. Arctic, Alaska.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of Serological and Molecular Tests Used for the Identification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

O VillardInstitut de Parasitologie et de Pathologie Tropicale de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ovillard@unistra.fr candolfi@unistra.fr.
B CimonLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Angers, France.
C L'OllivierLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.
H Fricker-HidalgoLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire A Michallon, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
N GodineauLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis, Saint-Denis, France.
S HouzeLaboratoire de Parasitologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Université Paris Descartes, UMR 216, Paris, France.
L ParisLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
H PellouxLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire A Michallon, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
I VillenaLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Maison Blanche, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire et Université de Reims Champagne Ardennes, Reims, France.
E CandolfiInstitut de Parasitologie et de Pathologie Tropicale de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ovillard@unistra.fr candolfi@unistra.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis, a benign infection, is asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic in over 80% of cases, except in immunocompetent patients suffering from ocular toxoplasmosis or in immunocompromised patients with opportunistic or congenital toxoplasmosis. Diagnosis is based mainly on serology testing. Thus, we compared the performance of the nine most commonly used commercial automated or semiautomated immunoassays for IgG and IgM Toxoplasma gondii antibody detection, that is, the Advia Centaur, Architect, AxSYM, Elecsys, Enzygnost, Liaison, Platelia, VIDAS, and VIDIA assays. The assays were conducted on four panels of serum samples derived during routine testing from patients with an interfering disease and who exhibited a low IgG antibody level in one of two clinical settings, namely, acute or chronic toxoplasmosis. As a result, IgG sensitivities ranged from 97.1% to 100%, and IgG specificities ranged from 99.5% to 100%. For IgG quantification, strong differences in IgG titers (expressed in IU/ml) were noted depending on the assay used. IgM sensitivities ranged from 65% to 97.9%, and IgM specificities ranged from 92.6% to 100%. For defining the best serological strategies to be implemented, it appears crucial to compare the diagnostic performance of the different tests with respect to their specificity and sensitivity in detecting the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanAutomation, LaboratoryHumansImmunoassayImmunocompromised HostImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSensitivity and SpecificityToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID27733631
PMCPMC5121397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.