ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2016
'Massive potential' or 'safety risk'? Health worker views on telehealth in the care of older people and implications for successful normalization.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Staff-reported barriers and facilitators to the implementation of healthcare interventions within regional and rural areas: a rapid review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Psychological Factors That Contribute to the Use of Video Consultations in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Telehealth and Autism Prior to and in the Age of COVID-19: A Systematic and Critical Review of the Last Decade.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2021Pooled it
- Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Multicomponent telerehabilitation program for veterans with multimorbidity: A randomized controlled feasibility study.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Experiences of Older Adults, Physiotherapists, and Aged Care Staff in the TOP UP Telephysiotherapy Program: Interview Study of the TOP UP Interventions.JMIR aging · 2024Trial
- Palliative care in rural, remote, and northern communities: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Afterhours telehealth in Australian residential aged care facilities: a mixed methods evaluation.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The experiences of patients with advanced heart failure, family carers, and health professionals with palliative care services: a secondary reflexive thematic analysis of longitudinal interview data.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Barriers to Video Call-Based Telehealth in Allied Health Professions and Nursing: Scoping Review and Mapping Process.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Changing attitudes towards teletherapy in Austrian therapists during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2023Article
- Health Care Professionals' Experiences and Perspectives on Using Telehealth for Home-based Palliative Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Factors that influence the provision of home-based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- An Examination of Occupational Therapy Telehealth Service Delivery Among Novice Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2023Article
- "Hard to Say Goodbye Over iPad": Experiences of Palliative Care Providers and Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Rural Communities of Indiana, United States.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2022Article
- Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- Pediatric Clinicians' Use of Telemedicine: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- Telehealth to the Rescue During COVID-19: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study Investigating Patients' Perception.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Human Touch via Touchscreen: Rural Nurses' Experiential Perspectives on Telehealth Use in Pediatric Hospice Care.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2020Article
- Discrepancies between Expected and Actual Implementation: The Process Evaluation of PERS Integration in Nursing Homes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTelehealth technologies, which enable delivery of healthcare services at distance, offer promise for responding to the challenges created by an ageing population. However, successful implementation of telehealth into mainstream healthcare systems has been slow and fraught with failure. Understanding of frontline providers' experiences and attitudes regarding telehealth is a crucial aspect of successful implementation. This study aims to examine healthcare worker views on telehealth, and their implications for implementation to mainstream healthcare services for older people. The study includes a focus on two further dimensions of urban versus rural services and level of clinician experience with telehealth.
methodsSeven semi-structured focus groups were conducted with a total of 44 healthcare workers providing services to older people in the areas of rehabilitation and allied health, residential aged care and palliative care. Focus groups included both telehealth experienced and inexperienced groups. Of the experienced groups, two provided services to both urban and rural patients, and two to rural patients. Inexperienced groups included one rural and two urban. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify predominant themes. Between-group differences and agreement in viewpoints for each of these themes are discussed and mapped to the theoretical constructs of Normalization Process Theory.
resultsThe views of participants varied with the extent of telehealth experience and perception of accessibility of healthcare services. Four themes describing clinician attitudes and perceptions that could impact on successful implementation of telehealth services are outlined: 1) Workability of telehealth: exponential growth in access or decay in the quality of healthcare? 2) What is an acceptable level of risk to patient safety with telehealth? 3) Shifting responsibilities and recalibrating the team; and 4) Change of architecture required to enable integration of telehealth service delivery.
conclusionsThe use of telehealth technologies to provide healthcare services to older people may be more readily normalized in areas where existing services are limited. Though exposure to telehealth may be a factor, changes to the perceived feasibility of telehealth in relation to conventional services, as well as supportive infrastructure and training and skill recalibration may be more critical to successful normalization of telehealth services for older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.