Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27733017›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016

Short-term and long-term effects of tibolone in postmenopausal women.

Giulio Formoso, Enrica Perrone, Susanna Maltoni, Sara Balduzzi, Jack Wilkinson, Vittorio Basevi, Anna Maria Marata, Nicola Magrini, Roberto D'Amico, Chiara Bassi and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Effect of menopausal symptom treatment options on palpitations: a systematic review.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tibolone and Breast Cancer.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Tibolone and Breast Tissue: a Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Giulio FormosoEmilia-Romagna Health and Welfare Directorate, Community Care Department, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Area, Viale Aldo Moro 21, Bologna, Italy, 40127.
Enrica Perrone
Susanna Maltoni
Sara Balduzzi
Jack Wilkinson
Vittorio Basevi
Anna Maria Marata
Nicola Magrini
Roberto D'Amico
Chiara Bassi
Emilio Maestri
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBOspedale Santa Maria · ITRegione Emilia-RomagnaUniversity of Bologna · ITWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTibolone is a synthetic steroid used for the treatment of menopausal symptoms, on the basis of short-term data suggesting its efficacy. We considered the balance between the benefits and risks of tibolone.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tibolone for treatment of postmenopausal and perimenopausal women. SEARCH

methodsIn October 2015, we searched the Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGF) Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO (from inception), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and clinicaltrials.gov. We checked the reference lists in articles retrieved. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tibolone versus placebo, oestrogens and/or combined hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal and perimenopausal women. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures of The Cochrane Collaboration. Primary outcomes were vasomotor symptoms, unscheduled vaginal bleeding and long-term adverse events. We evaluated safety outcomes and bleeding in studies including women either with or without menopausal symptoms. MAIN

resultsWe included 46 RCTs (19,976 women). Most RCTs evaluated tibolone for treating menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Some had other objectives, such as assessment of bleeding patterns, endometrial safety, bone health, sexuality and safety in women with a history of breast cancer. Two included women with uterine leiomyoma or lupus erythematosus. Tibolone versus placebo Vasomotor symptomsTibolone was more effective than placebo (standard mean difference (SMD) -0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.10 to -0.89; seven RCTs; 1657 women; moderate-quality evidence), but removing trials at high risk of attrition bias attenuated this effect (SMD -0.61, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.49; odds ratio (OR) 0.33, 85% CI 0.27 to 0.41). This suggests that if 67% of women taking placebo experience vasomotor symptoms, between 35% and 45% of women taking tibolone will do so. Unscheduled bleedingTibolone was associated with greater likelihood of bleeding (OR 2.79, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.70; nine RCTs; 7814 women; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsModerate-quality evidence suggests that tibolone is more effective than placebo but less effective than HT in reducing menopausal vasomotor symptoms, and that tibolone is associated with a higher rate of unscheduled bleeding than placebo but with a lower rate than HT.Compared with placebo, tibolone increases recurrent breast cancer rates in women with a history of breast cancer, and may increase stroke rates in women over 60 years of age. No evidence indicates that tibolone increases the risk of other long-term adverse events, or that it differs from HT with respect to long-term safety.Much of the evidence was of low or very low quality. Limitations included high risk of bias and imprecision. Most studies were financed by drug manufacturers or failed to disclose their funding source.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsDyspareuniaEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleHot FlashesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNorpregnenesPostmenopauseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeSweatingUterine HemorrhageEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsNorpregnenestibolone

Identifiers

PMID27733017
PMCPMC6458045
OpenAlexW1588513556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.