Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2016
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of ZMapp for Ebola Virus Infection.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02363322 (A Multicenter Randomized Safety and Efficacy Study of Putative Investigational Therapeutics in the Treatment of Patients With Known Ebola Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 254 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Randomized Safety and Efficacy Study of Putative Investigational Therapeutics in the Treatment of Patients With Known Ebola Infection
Who cites it
254 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical factors associated with mortality in ebola virus disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the research landscape of antibody therapy for Ebola virus disease: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Investigation of the Status of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Virology, Clinical Symptoms, Diagnosis, Prevention, Treatment and Classification of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD): A Systematic Review.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2025Pooled it
- Investigation of the Status of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Virology, Clinical Symptoms, Diagnosis, Prevention, Treatment and Classification of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD): A Systematic Review.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2025Pooled it
- The number of cases, mortality and treatments of viral hemorrhagic fevers: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of therapies for Ebola virus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Lancet. Microbe · 2022Pooled it
- Anti-Ebola therapy for patients with Ebola virus disease: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Pooled it
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase I trial to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a plant-produced, bivalent, recombinant norovirus-like particle vaccine.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Trial
- Evaluation by simulation of clinical trial designs for evaluation of treatment during a viral haemorrhagic fever outbreak.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics.The New England journal of medicine · 2019Trial
- Trial
- A bispecific antibody targeting conserved hemagglutinin epitopes confers broad protection against H7 avian influenza and accelerates viral clearance via localized respiratory delivery.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Plant-based production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies targeting extracellular enveloped proteins of the Mpox Virus.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Planning for the future of the American Society for Microbiology's Health Unit by the Council on Microbial Sciences.mSphere · 2026Review
- Targeting the lethal weakness of SFTSV: Latest advances in antiviral strategies and immune prevention.iScience · 2026Review
- On topological co-index polynomials for predictive modeling of the physicochemical properties of antiviral drugs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of VP30-targeted nanoparticles using DPS4 fusion peptides for the inhibition of Ebola virus.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Review
- Rational design of next-generation filovirus vaccines combining glycoprotein stabilization and nanoparticle display with glycan modification.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Rational design of next-generation filovirus vaccines through glycoprotein stabilization, nanoparticle display, and glycan modification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundData from studies in nonhuman primates suggest that the triple monoclonal antibody cocktail ZMapp is a promising immune-based treatment for Ebola virus disease (EVD).
methodsBeginning in March 2015, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial of ZMapp plus the current standard of care as compared with the current standard of care alone in patients with EVD that was diagnosed in West Africa by polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay. Eligible patients of any age were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the current standard of care or the current standard of care plus three intravenous infusions of ZMapp (50 mg per kilogram of body weight, administered every third day). Patients were stratified according to baseline PCR cycle-threshold value for the virus (≤22 vs. >22) and country of enrollment. Oral favipiravir was part of the current standard of care in Guinea. The primary end point was mortality at 28 days.
resultsA total of 72 patients were enrolled at sites in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea, and the United States. Of the 71 patients who could be evaluated, 21 died, representing an overall case fatality rate of 30%. Death occurred in 13 of 35 patients (37%) who received the current standard of care alone and in 8 of 36 patients (22%) who received the current standard of care plus ZMapp. The observed posterior probability that ZMapp plus the current standard of care was superior to the current standard of care alone was 91.2%, falling short of the prespecified threshold of 97.5%. Frequentist analyses yielded similar results (absolute difference in mortality with ZMapp, -15 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -36 to 7). Baseline viral load was strongly predictive of both mortality and duration of hospitalization in all age groups.
conclusionsIn this randomized, controlled trial of a putative therapeutic agent for EVD, although the estimated effect of ZMapp appeared to be beneficial, the result did not meet the prespecified statistical threshold for efficacy. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; PREVAIL II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02363322 .).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.