Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27732640›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Reference Values for Cardiac and Aortic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Healthy, Young Caucasian Adults.

Anouk L M Eikendal, Michiel L Bots, Cees Haaring, Tobias Saam, Rob J van der Geest, Jos J M Westenberg, Hester M den Ruijter, Imo E Hoefer, Tim Leiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Preclinical Aortic Atherosclerosis in Adolescents With Chronic Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anouk L M EikendalDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michiel L BotsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cees HaaringDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tobias SaamInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Rob J van der GeestDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jos J M WestenbergDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hester M den RuijterLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Imo E HoeferLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tim LeinerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReference values for morphological and functional parameters of the cardiovascular system in early life are relevant since they may help to identify young adults who fall outside the physiological range of arterial and cardiac ageing. This study provides age and sex specific reference values for aortic wall characteristics, cardiac function parameters and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in a population-based sample of healthy, young adults using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 131 randomly selected healthy, young adults aged between 25 and 35 years (mean age 31.8 years, 63 men) of the general-population based Atherosclerosis-Monitoring-and-Biomarker-measurements-In-The-YOuNg (AMBITYON) study, descending thoracic aortic dimensions and wall thickness, thoracic aortic PWV and cardiac function parameters were measured using a 3.0T MR-system. Age and sex specific reference values were generated using dedicated software. Differences in reference values between two age groups (25-30 and 30-35 years) and both sexes were tested.

resultsAortic diameters and areas were higher in the older age group (all p<0.007). Moreover, aortic dimensions, left ventricular mass, left and right ventricular volumes and cardiac output were lower in women than in men (all p<0.001). For mean and maximum aortic wall thickness, left and right ejection fraction and aortic PWV we did not observe a significant age or sex effect.

conclusionThis study provides age and sex specific reference values for cardiovascular MR parameters in healthy, young Caucasian adults. These may aid in MR guided pre-clinical identification of young adults who fall outside the physiological range of arterial and cardiac ageing.

Indexed as

AdultAortaAtherosclerosisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeartHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePulse Wave AnalysisReference Values

Identifiers

PMID27732640
PMCPMC5061387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.