Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27732064›Full record

ArticleAssay and drug development technologies2016

Discovery of Small Molecules That Induce Lysosomal Cell Death in Cancer Cell Lines Using an Image-Based Screening Platform.

Romina J Pagliero, Diego S D'Astolfo, Daphne Lelieveld, Riyona D Pratiwi, Sonja Aits, Marja Jaattela, Nathaniel I Martin, Judith Klumperman, David A Egan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assay and drug development technologies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Romina J Pagliero1 Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) , Utrecht, the Netherlands .
Diego S D'Astolfo1 Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) , Utrecht, the Netherlands .
Daphne Lelieveld1 Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) , Utrecht, the Netherlands .
Riyona D Pratiwi1 Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) , Utrecht, the Netherlands .
Sonja Aits3 Cell Death and Metabolism Unit, Center for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease, Danish Cancer Society Research Center , Copenhagen, Denmark .
Marja Jaattela3 Cell Death and Metabolism Unit, Center for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease, Danish Cancer Society Research Center , Copenhagen, Denmark .
Nathaniel I Martin4 Department of Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University , Utrecht, the Netherlands .
Judith Klumperman1 Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) , Utrecht, the Netherlands .
David A Egan1 Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) , Utrecht, the Netherlands .
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLDanish Cancer Society · DKPharmo Institute · NL

Funding

European Research Council 340751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lysosomal cell death (LCD) pathway is a caspase 3-independent cell death pathway that has been suggested as a possible target for cancer therapy, making the development of sensitive and specific high-throughput (HT) assays to identify LCD inducers highly desirable. In this study, we report a two-step HT screening platform to reliably identify such molecules. First, using a robust HT primary screen based on propidium iodide uptake, we identified compounds that kill through nonapoptotic pathways. A phenotypic image-based assay using a galectin-3 (Gal-3) reporter was then used to further classify hits based on lysosomal permeabilization, a hallmark of LCD. The identification of permeabilized lysosomes in our image-based assay is not affected by changes in the lysosomal pH, thus resolving an important limitation in currently used methods. We have validated our platform in a screen by identifying 24 LCD inducers, some previously known to induce LCD. Although most LCD inducers were cationic amphiphilic drugs (CADs), we have also identified a non-CAD LCD inducer, which is of great interest in the field. Our data also gave new insights into the biology of LCD, suggesting that lysosomal accumulation and acid sphingomyelinase inhibition are not sufficient or necessary for the induction of LCD. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust HT platform to identify novel LCD inducers that will also be very useful for gaining deeper insights into the molecular mechanism of LCD induction.

Indexed as

Cell DeathDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DiscoveryDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansIndolesLysosomesMCF-7 CellsSmall Molecule LibrariesSpiro CompoundsIndolesLu 28-179Small Molecule LibrariesSpiro Compoundsgalectin-3 reporterhigh throughput screeningLMP phenotypic assaylysosomal cell dead

Identifiers

PMID27732064
PMCPMC7611321
OpenAlexW2542616543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.