Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27732022›Full record

ArticleJournal of abnormal psychology2016

A comparison and integration of structural models of depression and anxiety in a clinical sample: Support for and validation of the tri-level model.

Kristin Naragon-Gainey, Jason M Prenoveau, Timothy A Brown, Richard E Zinbarg

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abnormal psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Positive and Negative Aspects of Life Events in Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The clinical characterization of the adult patient with an anxiety or related disorder aimed at personalization of management.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristin Naragon-GaineyDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
Jason M PrenoveauDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Maryland.
Timothy A BrownCenter for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University.
Richard E ZinbargDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University.

Funding

THE CLASSIFICATION OF ANXIETY DISORDERSR01MH039096 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI BROWN, TIMOTHY A. · 1985 to 2017
$8.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH039096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prominent structural models of depression and anxiety arise from 2 traditions: (a) the tripartite/integrative hierarchical model based on symptom dimensions, and (b) the fear/anxious-misery model based on diagnostic comorbidity data. The tri-level model of depression and anxiety was developed to synthesize these structural models, postulating that narrow (disorder-specific), intermediate (fear and anxious-misery), and broad (general distress) structural factors are needed to most fully account for covariation among these symptoms. Although this model has received preliminary support (Prenoveau et al., 2010), the current study compares it with the above established models and seeks to validate the best-fitting structure. We evaluated the tri-level model and alternative structural models in a large clinical sample (N = 1,000) using bifactor analysis. In exploratory and confirmatory subsamples, the tri-level model provided a good fit to the data and each of the 3 levels (narrow, intermediate, and broad) accounted for substantial variance; this model provided a superior fit relative to more parsimonious competing structural models. Furthermore, impairment was independently associated with all 3 levels of the tri-level model, comorbidity was most closely linked to the broad tri-level dimensions, and the factors generally showed the expected convergent/discriminant associations with diagnoses. Results suggested several revisions to prior research: (a) worry may be best modeled at the broadest structural level, rather than as an indicator of anxious-misery or fear; (b) social interaction anxiety may belong with anxious-misery, rather than fear; and (c) obsessive-compulsive disorder is generally associated with fear disorders, but hoarding is associated with both fear and anxious-misery. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAnxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27732022
PMCPMC5117805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.