ArticleNMR in biomedicine2016
Fast diffusion kurtosis imaging of fibrotic mouse kidneys.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spectral shaping technology reduces the radiation dose of CT-guided lung tumor microwave ablation.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Diffusion kurtosis imaging for detecting renal functional changes in glomerulonephritis: a longitudinal experimental study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM diffusion study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 1: In vivo small-animal imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Review
- Renal interstitial fibrotic assessment using non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging in a rat model of hyperuricemia.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Based on functional and histopathological correlations: is diffusion kurtosis imaging valuable for noninvasive assessment of renal damage in early-stage of chronic kidney disease?International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- Early assessment of acute kidney injury in severe acute pancreatitis with multimodal DWI: an animal model.European radiology · 2023Article
- Optimization of quasi-diffusion magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative accuracy and time-efficient acquisition.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Renal functional and interstitial fibrotic assessment with non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing type of papillary renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary study.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Magnetic resonance quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion in hepatic fibrosis staging: a pilot study of diffusion kurtosis imaging to identify reversible hepatic fibrosis.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Respiratory Motion Mitigation and Repeatability of Two Diffusion-Weighted MRI Methods Applied to a Murine Model of Spontaneous Pancreatic Cancer.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2021Article
- Visualization of live, mammalian neurons during Kainate-infusion using magnetic resonance microscopy.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging as a Tool in Neurotoxicology.Neurotoxicity research · 2020Article
- An Introduction to Kurtosis Fractional Anisotropy.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019Review
- Multiparametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluating Renal Allograft Injury.Korean journal of radiology · 2019Review
- Differential microstructural alterations in rat cerebral cortex in a model of chronic mild stress depression.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Precision and accuracy of diffusion kurtosis estimation and the influence of b-value selection.NMR in biomedicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is sensitive to tissue microstructure and may therefore be useful in the diagnosis and monitoring of disease in brain and body organs. Generally, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) in the body is challenging because of the heterogeneous body composition, which can cause image artefacts as a result of chemical shifts and susceptibility differences. In addition, the abdomen possesses physiological factors (e.g. breathing, heartbeat, blood flow) which may severely reduce image quality, especially when echo planar imaging is employed, as is typical in dMRI. Collectively, these challenging measurement conditions impede the use and exploration of DKI in the body. This impediment is further exacerbated by the traditionally large amount of data required for DKI and the low signal-to-noise ratio at the b-values needed to effectively probe the kurtosis regime. Recently introduced fast DKI techniques reduce the challenge of DKI in the body by decreasing the data requirement substantially, so that, for example, triggering and breath-hold techniques may be applied for the entire DKI acquisition without causing unfeasible scan times. One common pathological condition for which body DKI may be of immediate clinical value is kidney fibrosis, which causes progressive changes in organ microstructure. With its sensitivity to microstructure, DKI is an obvious candidate for a non-invasive evaluation method. We present preclinical evidence indicating that the rapidly obtainable tensor-derived mean kurtosis ( W̅) distinguishes moderately fibrotic kidneys from healthy controls. The presence and degree of fibrosis are confirmed by histology, which also indicates fibrosis as the main driver behind the DKI differences observed between groups. We therefore conclude that fast kurtosis is a likely candidate for an MRI-based method for the detection and monitoring of renal fibrosis. We provide protocol recommendations for fast renal DKI in humans based on a b-value optimisation performed using data acquired at 3 T in normal human kidney.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.