Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27730406›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Enhanced recovery implementation in colorectal surgery-temporary or persistent improvement?

David Martin, Didier Roulin, Valérie Addor, Catherine Blanc, Nicolas Demartines, Martin Hübner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Principles of enhanced recovery in gastrointestinal surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David MartinDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Didier RoulinDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Valérie AddorDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine BlancDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas DemartinesDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland. demartines@chuv.ch.
Martin HübnerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) implementation has proven to reduce complication rate and length of hospital stay. Little is known about the sustainability of these results over time. The study aim was to assess the application of ERAS pathway over the first 4 years after initial implementation.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data collected prospectively from 482 consecutive elective colorectal patients operated in 2011 during the ERAS implementation process (n = 66), and after initial implementation in 2012 (n = 136), 2013 (n = 152), and 2014 (n = 128). Auditing ERAS was appraised from different perspectives: adherence with the ERAS protocol, clinical outcomes, and functional recovery. Patients were compared by year.

resultsThe groups were similar in terms of demographics and surgical strategies. Length of stay remained stable at 7 days without significant variation over time (p = 0.741). The 30-day complications and readmission rates were not statistically different (respectively p = 0.068 and p = 0.639). There was also no difference in functional recovery, more particularly, first flatus occurred at day 2 (p = 0.177), pain was adequately controlled with oral analgesics at day 2 (p = 0.111), and patients were mobilized more than 4 h the first postoperative day in more than 60 % of cases (p = 0.343). Overall adherence with the ERAS pathway was 73 % during implementation and, respectively, 73 and 77 % for 2012 and 2013 after initial implementation (p = 0.614). A significant decrease between 2013 (77 %) and 2014 (73 %) was observed (p = 0.032).

conclusionsApplication of the institutional ERAS pathway could be maintained in the first 4 years after implementation leading to sustained improved functional recovery and clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Postoperative CareRecovery of FunctionAgedAged, 80 and overClinical ProtocolsColectomyColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeColorectal surgeryEnhanced recoveryImplementationSustainability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.