ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016
Enhanced recovery implementation in colorectal surgery-temporary or persistent improvement?
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Can a fast-track protocol for elective colorectal resections be sustained in the clinical routine of German hospitals?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Malignant bowel obstruction related to advanced peritoneal metastases: survival outcomes of surgical treatment.Pleura and peritoneum · 2026Article
- Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) program in neurosurgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Review
- Principles of enhanced recovery in gastrointestinal surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Review
- Enhanced recovery after surgery in colon and rectal surgery: identification of predictive variables of failure in a monocentric series including 733 patients.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery review and urology applications in 2020.BJUI compass · 2020Review
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Interactive Audit System: 10 Years' Experience with an International Web-Based Clinical and Research Perioperative Care Database.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2019Review
- Is It Possible to Maintain High Compliance with the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol?-A Cohort Study of 400 Consecutive Colorectal Cancer Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Article
- The Safety of Selective Use of Splenic Flexure Mobilization in Sigmoid and Rectal Resections-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) implementation has proven to reduce complication rate and length of hospital stay. Little is known about the sustainability of these results over time. The study aim was to assess the application of ERAS pathway over the first 4 years after initial implementation.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data collected prospectively from 482 consecutive elective colorectal patients operated in 2011 during the ERAS implementation process (n = 66), and after initial implementation in 2012 (n = 136), 2013 (n = 152), and 2014 (n = 128). Auditing ERAS was appraised from different perspectives: adherence with the ERAS protocol, clinical outcomes, and functional recovery. Patients were compared by year.
resultsThe groups were similar in terms of demographics and surgical strategies. Length of stay remained stable at 7 days without significant variation over time (p = 0.741). The 30-day complications and readmission rates were not statistically different (respectively p = 0.068 and p = 0.639). There was also no difference in functional recovery, more particularly, first flatus occurred at day 2 (p = 0.177), pain was adequately controlled with oral analgesics at day 2 (p = 0.111), and patients were mobilized more than 4 h the first postoperative day in more than 60 % of cases (p = 0.343). Overall adherence with the ERAS pathway was 73 % during implementation and, respectively, 73 and 77 % for 2012 and 2013 after initial implementation (p = 0.614). A significant decrease between 2013 (77 %) and 2014 (73 %) was observed (p = 0.032).
conclusionsApplication of the institutional ERAS pathway could be maintained in the first 4 years after implementation leading to sustained improved functional recovery and clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27730406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.