Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27730305›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

Androgen receptor expression is associated with adverse pathological features in ureteral but not in pelvicalyceal urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract.

G J Wirth, A Haitel, M Moschini, F Soria, T Klatte, M R Hassler, K Bensalah, A Briganti, J A Karam, Y Lotan and 8 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

G J WirthDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
A HaitelDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
M MoschiniDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
F SoriaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
T KlatteDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
M R HasslerDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
K BensalahDepartment of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.
A BrigantiDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
J A KaramDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Y LotanDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
V MargulisDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
J D RamanDivision of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
M RemziDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
N Rioux-LeclercqDepartment of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.
B D RobinsonDepartment of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
M RouprêtAcademic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France.
C G WoodDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
S F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATCornell University · USMedical University of Vienna · ATThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USVienna General Hospital · ATAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to determine the significance of androgen receptor (AR) expression in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UTUC).

methodsAR expression was assessed on tissue microarrays containing specimens of 737 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent. AR expression was correlated with clinical and pathological tumor features as well as recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsOverall, AR was expressed in 11 % of tumors. AR expression was significantly associated with tumor necrosis as well as sessile and multifocal tumor growth but not with RFS, CSS or OS. AR was detected nearly twice as often in tumors of the ureter than of the pelvicalyceal system (p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses showed that the significant associations of AR with unfavorable pathologic features were exclusively attributable to tumors located in the ureter. However, in both ureteral and pelvicalyceal tumors, AR status was independent of RFS, CSS and OS.

conclusionsIn this cohort of patients treated with RNU, AR expression was found in approximately 10 % of UTUCs, twice as often in ureteral than in pelvicalyceal tumors. While AR expression had no impact on postoperative prognosis, it was significantly associated with unfavorable pathologic features in ureteral tumors. Steroid hormone signaling might be relevant for future investigations of differences between ureteral and pelvicalyceal tumors.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdultAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, AndrogenAR protein, humanReceptors, AndrogenAndrogen receptorRadical nephroureterectomyTissue microarrayUpper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID27730305
OpenAlexW2531536063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.