Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27730258›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2017

Variability of control data and relevance of observed group differences in five oral toxicity studies with genetically modified maize MON810 in rats.

Kerstin Schmidt, Jörg Schmidtke, Paul Schmidt, Christian Kohl, Ralf Wilhelm, Joachim Schiemann, Hilko van der Voet, Pablo Steinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advancing human health risk assessment.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Safety Assessments and Multiplicity Adjustment: Comments on a Recent Paper.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kerstin SchmidtBioMath GmbH, Schnickmannstr. 4, 18055, Rostock, Germany. kerstin.schmidt@biomath.de.
Jörg SchmidtkeBioMath GmbH, Schnickmannstr. 4, 18055, Rostock, Germany.
Paul SchmidtBioMath GmbH, Schnickmannstr. 4, 18055, Rostock, Germany.
Christian KohlInstitute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Julius Kühn Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Ralf WilhelmInstitute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Julius Kühn Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Joachim SchiemannInstitute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Julius Kühn Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Hilko van der VoetWageningen UR Biometris, Postbus 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Pablo SteinbergInstitute for Food Toxicology and Analytical Chemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The data of four 90-day feeding trials and a 1-year feeding trial with the genetically modified (GM) maize MON810 in Wistar Han RCC rats performed in the frame of EU-funded project GRACE were analysed. Firstly, the data obtained from the groups having been fed the non-GM maize diets were combined to establish a historical control data set for Wistar Han RCC rats at the animal housing facility (Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia). The variability of all parameters is described, and the reference values and ranges have been derived. Secondly, the consistency of statistically significant differences found in the five studies was analysed. In order to do so, the body weight development, organ weight, haematology and clinical biochemistry data were compared between the studies. Based on the historical control data, equivalence ranges for these parameters were defined, and the values measured in the GM maize-fed groups were compared with these equivalence ranges. Thirdly, the (statistical) power of these feeding studies with whole food/feed was assessed and detectable toxicologically relevant group differences were derived. Linear mixed models (LMM) were applied, and standardized effect sizes (SES) were calculated in order to compare different parameters as well as to provide an overall picture of group and study differences at a glance. The comparison of the five feeding trials showed a clear study effect in the control data. It also showed inconsistency both in the frequency of statistically significant differences and in the difference values between control and test groups.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsBody WeightFemaleFood, Genetically ModifiedLinear ModelsMaleOrgan SizePlants, Genetically ModifiedRatsRats, WistarTime FactorsToxicity TestsZea mays90-day toxicity studyConsistencyGenetically modified plantsHistorical control dataLinear mixed modelsMaizeRisk assessmentStandardized effect sizesStatistical power

Identifiers

PMID27730258
PMCPMC5364247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.