Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27730255›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2017

Isolating Escherichia coli strains for recombinant protein production.

Susan Schlegel, Pierre Genevaux, Jan-Willem de Gier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surface display of carbonic anhydrase onSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New tools for recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli: A 5-year update.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Directed evolution to improve protein folding in vivo.Current opinion in structural biology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan SchlegelDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Pierre GenevauxLaboratoire de Microbiologie et de Génétique Moléculaires, Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Jan-Willem de GierDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Svante Arrheniusväg 16C, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. degier@dbb.su.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli has been widely used for the production of recombinant proteins. To improve protein production yields in E. coli, directed engineering approaches have been commonly used. However, there are only few reported examples of the isolation of E. coli protein production strains using evolutionary approaches. Here, we first give an introduction to bacterial evolution and mutagenesis to set the stage for discussing how so far selection- and screening-based approaches have been used to isolate E. coli protein production strains. Finally, we discuss how evolutionary approaches may be used in the future to isolate E. coli strains with improved protein production characteristics.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliMutagenesisMutationRecombinant ProteinsDNA, BacterialRecombinant ProteinsEscherichia coliEvolutionMutagenesisProtein productionRecombinant proteinStrain isolation

Identifiers

PMID27730255
PMCPMC5306230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.