ArticleERJ open research2016
Using social media to improve communication with people with cystic fibrosis.
Article in ERJ open research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Living with cystic fibrosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a social connectedness perspective.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2022Article
- Perceptions of Social Media Use to Augment Health Care Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Survey Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2021Article
- Social media use to improve communication on children and adolescent's health: the role of the Italian Paediatric Society influencers.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Pro con debates in clinical medicine infection prevention and control in cystic fibrosis: One size fits all? The argument in favour.Paediatric respiratory reviews · 2020Review
- Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis.Research involvement and engagement · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.