ArticleCMAJ open
Introducing pharmacogenetic testing with clinical decision support into primary care: a feasibility study.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Results of the ACCOuNT Trial: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Pharmacogenomics Implementation Trial for African American Inpatients.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Observational
- Article
- The Perceived Value of Pharmacogenetic Testing in Depression Treatment: Mixed-Methods Results From the PRIME Care Study.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Improving prescribing: a feasibility study of pharmacogenetic testing with clinical decision support in primary healthcare in Singapore.Family practice · 2024Article
- Implementing pharmacogenomic testing in Australian general practice: an exploratory qualitative study.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
- Identification of Drugs Acting as Perpetrators in Common Drug Interactions in a Cohort of Geriatric Patients from Southern Italy and Analysis of the Gene Polymorphisms That Affect Their Interacting Potential.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Theory-Informed Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Multi-Drug Pharmacogenomic Testing.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Clinical implementation of drug metabolizing gene-based therapeutic interventions worldwide.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Pharmacogenomic testing to support prescribing in primary care: a structured review of implementation models.Pharmacogenomics · 2021Review
- Implementation of a Pharmacogenomic Testing Service through Community Pharmacy in the Netherlands: Results from an Early Service Evaluation.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Re: Pharmacogenetic Testing Options Relevant to Psychiatry in Canada.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020Article
- Influence of metabolic profiles on the safety of drug therapy in routine care in Germany: protocol of the cohort study EMPAR.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Article
- Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Preemptive Panel-Based Pharmacogenetic Testing: The Time is Now.Pharmaceutical research · 2017Review
- Integrating clinical decision support systems for pharmacogenomic testing into clinical routine - a scoping review of designs of user-system interactions in recent system development.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- Integrating pharmacogenetic testing into primary care.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInappropriate prescribing increases patient illness and death owing to adverse drug events. The inclusion of genetic information into primary care medication practices is one solution. Our aim was to assess the ability to obtain and genotype saliva samples and to determine the levels of use of a decision support tool that creates medication options adjusted for patient characteristics, drug-drug interactions and pharmacogenetics.
methodsWe conducted a cohort study in 6 primary care settings (5 family practices and 1 pharmacy), enrolling 191 adults with at least 1 of 10 common diseases. Saliva samples were obtained in the physician's office or pharmacy and sent to our laboratory, where DNA was extracted and genotyped and reports were generated. The reports were sent directly to the family physician/pharmacist and linked to an evidence-based prescribing decision support system. The primary outcome was ability to obtain and genotype samples. The secondary outcomes were yield and purity of DNA samples, ability to link results to decision support software and use of the decision support software.
resultsGenotyping resulted in linking of 189 patients (99%) with pharmacogenetic reports to the decision support program. A total of 96.8% of samples had at least 1 actionable genotype for medications included in the decision support system. The medication support system was used by the physicians and pharmacists 236 times over 3 months.
interpretationPhysicians and pharmacists can collect saliva samples of sufficient quantity and quality for DNA extraction, purification and genotyping. A clinical decision support system with integrated data from pharmacogenetic tests may enable personalized prescribing within primary care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.